Comments Thread For: Golovkin Disagrees With Canelo's Stance on 'Title' For Trilogy

[Lance98]

GGG and his team have been talking reckless and contradicting themselves at every turn that it is downright pitiful. How is GGG going to be a future promoter when he can't even talk right, and when he talks through his translator, you can find so many flaws and contradictions. Tom loefler as well as abel sanchez aren't very bright with their words either, especially abel who always have a foot in his mouth. This is not going to go well to be honest, and DAZN giving him so much leeway as well as equity is pretty dumb on their part as well. Just a disaster all around.

[TonyGe]

nope, not to me

I saw a clear win

I saw that one guy was able to fight his fight, effectively..... and the other guy, was not able to fight his fight effectively

I saw one guy follow his gameplan perfectly, and adjust..... while the other guy could not follow his gameplan, and did not adjust

I saw one guy control the fight and win the exchanges with BETTER eye-catching judge-friendly punches.....

and the guy who did all of that also exhibited better defence than his opponent, as well as better skills

I have no doubt whatsoever who the better fighter is..... none

What a pile of BS. What happened to Canelo's game of going to the ropes making the guy miss and countering. Where was his upper body weaving that he was known for. Gone because he was forced by the fallout from the first fight to abandon those tactics if he was to have a hope if winning. He knew in his heart and his trainers knew that he lost that first fight. Canelo in the second fight did exactly what I posted prior to the rematch that he had to do to have a chance of winning. There was no adjustment in the second fight. What he did was abandon the idiotic game plan he had in the first fight.

[Gideon lock]

I agree with golovkin, what titles did canelo have coming into there first fight? None and the fight still went ahead. For Canelo to say no fight without a title is just petty and unnecessary. Going by that logic he wouldn't be fighting any mandatories as they havent got a title?

[aboutfkntime]

Golovkin Disagrees With Canelo's Stance on 'Title' For Trilogy

[aboutfkntime]

You're full of s*** is what you are. You watch fights strictly biased for the Mexican because if you didn't see ggg adjust in that fight then you're a complete moron. If you don't think it was controversial.. Again you're a f'ing moron.

" he did what he could " ~ Abel Sanchez

Im not Mexican

[Motorcity Cobra]

The only ones who wants to see a trilogy are GGG fans. Everyone else has moved on. The first two fights were good fights but neither guy can hurt each other. Canelo adjusted the second fight and GGG didn't have a plan B. Canelo beats him even more convincingly in a 3rd fight.

Let's move on and see how they matchup against other middleweights.

[NotaPachugger]

You would think that Canelo would like to beat ggg without controversy with or without a title. With that being said, there are other fights that both should take instead and none of those opponents should be named Rolls.

GGG s fraud outside of Canelo and Jacobs he has fought nothing but bums. Refuses to fight BJS, Hurd or Charlo

[NotaPachugger]

You would think that Canelo would like to beat ggg without controversy with or without a title. With that being said, there are other fights that both should take instead and none of those opponents should be named Rolls.

GGG s fraud outside of Canelo and Jacobs he has fought nothing but bums. Refuses to fight BJS, Hurd or Charlo just wants Canelo payday.

[texasboi15]

this pathetic bum crusher still owes jacobs a rematch.

Without fckin question the REALEST post in this thread.

[TonyGe]

Totally hate free, sensible post. Why are you on a Trip G/Canelo thread?

Good question.... Don't know probably childhood trauma or something...