Leaving Neverland - Michael Jackson abuse doc shown at film festival-damning reviews

[Brutus1]

Jackson paid him off, that's why the case was dropped.

Jackson did not pay him off, an insurance company did. The father and "victim" were free to pursue a criminal case, which they would have lost. In the years since, Jordy has admitted to friends that nothing had happened to him.

[Robbie Barrett]

Jackson did not pay him off, an insurance company did. The father and "victim" were free to pursue a criminal case, which they would have lost. In the years since, Jordy has admitted to friends that nothing had happened to him.

He drew Jacksons dick and when the cops took pictures it matched. At the very least he saw Jackson dick.

They found 10+ books with pics of naked boys in them in jacksons house.

They found his and boys fingerprints on **** books.


He was a pedo. There's no doubt.

[Brutus1]

He drew Jacksons dick and when the cops took pictures it matched. At the very least he saw Jackson dick.

They found 10+ books with pics of naked boys in them in jacksons house.

They found his and boys fingerprints on **** books.


He was a pedo. There's no doubt.

Actually, they didn't. The so called pics of naked boys was a false story originated by radaronline.

Also he drew the dick, but the detail and description didn't match. The 93 case was weak. The 05 case was weaker. 2019, the case is a sob story set to a violin.

[Brutus1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHvm...cDwvP8d4U46oQ4

[Brutus1]

In case you missed, its pretty comprehensive.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...uTs8qqE6H6SuCA

[Robbie Barrett]

Actually, they didn't. The so called pics of naked boys was a false story originated by radaronline.

Also he drew the dick, but the detail and description didn't match. The 93 case was weak. The 05 case was weaker. 2019, the case is a sob story set to a violin.

but it did match.

However, according to child sexual abuse consultant Bill Dworin, one of the lead detectives on the case, Jordan's description comported with the photos taken of Jackson's genitalia.[52] Dr. Richard Strick, who conducted the examination of Jackson's genitals, said "I was told later that the photos and description absolutely matched".[53] Sneddon later stated that "the photographs reveal a mark on the right side of Defendant's ***** at about the same relative location as the dark blemish located by Jordan Chandler on his drawing of Defendant's erect *****", and that "Chandler's graphic representation of the discolored area on Defendant's ***** is substantially corroborated by the photographs".[54] Sergeant Gary Spiegel, the sheriff's photographer, claims he observed a dark spot on the lower side of Jackson's *****.[55]




No the books are true.

https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/201...chael-jackson/


Jackson was a pedo.

[Redd Foxx]

Uh, the 1993 criminal case couldn't go forward due to lack of evidence, do some research.

You know nothing about the settlements apparently. You have no interest in the truth. You're a trashcan alt. Get ignored bytch.

[Brutus1]

https://www.reddit.com/r/MichaelJack...l_is_innocent/

Take a look. C U N T.

[Brutus1]

but it did match.

However, according to child sexual abuse consultant Bill Dworin, one of the lead detectives on the case, Jordan's description comported with the photos taken of Jackson's genitalia.[52] Dr. Richard Strick, who conducted the examination of Jackson's genitals, said "I was told later that the photos and description absolutely matched".[53] Sneddon later stated that "the photographs reveal a mark on the right side of Defendant's ***** at about the same relative location as the dark blemish located by Jordan Chandler on his drawing of Defendant's erect *****", and that "Chandler's graphic representation of the discolored area on Defendant's ***** is substantially corroborated by the photographs".[54] Sergeant Gary Spiegel, the sheriff's photographer, claims he observed a dark spot on the lower side of Jackson's *****.[55]




No the books are true.

https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/201...chael-jackson/


Jackson was a pedo.

No, once again I have posted two videos. That stuff was covered. The fact the pictures of Jackson's dick didn't match the descriptions given. That's why the 93 case couldn't be pushed forward as a criminal case.

[Brutus1]

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b0f06648f4a3f8

Yet another link you will no doubt ignore.