should be an age limit on this ****, 35-55yrs old that its, that all your political career should last.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg fractures 3 ribs in fall
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Vlad_ View PostBad for Ginsburg and I don’t wish her harm personally, but politically she should retire or be forced out. She’s extremely old, likely senile, she is very partisan, and it’s time for ***** to appoint a third Justice on the SCOTUS.
***** has how many Senate seats now?
Comment
-
Originally posted by PotentialToast View PostHow any nation can proclaim itself as free and yet appoint judges by political nomination is beyond me.
SC Justices are nominated by an elected President, and must be confirmed by the Senate, which is a body of elected officials.
Sounds like freedom to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1bad65 View PostWhat do you mean?
SC Justices are nominated by an elected President, and must be confirmed by the Senate, which is a body of elected officials.
Sounds like freedom to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PotentialToast View PostPoliticians are not to be trusted with a concept as fundamental to a fair society as impartiality of the judiciary. No matter what political allegiance you have.
Comment
-
There should truly be an age limit for Supreme Court Justices for both ********s and **********s. Once you hit 75 it should be mandatory that you have to retire. Not only do you start losing your mental capabilities but people at that age also start becoming very out of touch with the general society.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mooshashi View PostThe system has worked for 200+ years. Our representatives "represent" us; we can vote them out if we don't like them. Judges at the local levels are voted on directly by the voting population; at the national level, by national representatives.
Comment
Comment