The 16" is flexed and Tyson's arms really aren't that huge. He's just a short squat guy and therefore they look big for his size.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tyson Has A 42" Chest?
Collapse
-
-
Ya his arms were really short and compact. everyones bodys are different and you all should love yourselfs for what you are
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Pretender View PostNo way in hell Tyson had only 16" arms. Maybe if measured in relaxed state. But in bodybuilding its measured with flexing to get bicep peak. I have 16 1/2" arms from weight lifting and I know Tyson has bigger arms than me. He's probably 18".
Is that you with the United States President in your avatar?
Comment
-
didn't foreman only have a 46 inch chest?
tyson had loads of muscle on a small frame. foreman had loads of muscle on a big frame.
still when you look at tysons pecs and lats its hard to believe
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Pretender View PostNo way in hell Tyson had only 16" arms. Maybe if measured in relaxed state. But in bodybuilding its measured with flexing to get bicep peak. I have 16 1/2" arms from weight lifting and I know Tyson has bigger arms than me. He's probably 18".
due to weights they were 20" when he was fighting in the 80's
Comment
-
tyson had very short arms this makes them look bigger, mine are over 17inches but tysons certainly look bigger! foremans were only 16@ in his prime.
Comment
-
Comparing it to other heavyweight champs it wasnt very small. In fact it was the same as Fraziers and Foreman (first time he was champ)
http://www.ibhof.com/ibhftape.htm
Comment
Comment