I was dissapointed with Arthur Abraham

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • El Jesus
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 9468
    • 553
    • 191
    • 17,604

    #21
    Originally posted by Novirasputin
    as somebody else replying to this said

    Those were warnings not the PD's
    BUT those were all definately below the belt and hence illegal.
    they were not borderline at all.
    Some of them were definately borderline on the belt, keep in mind his beltline was also high.

    Comment

    • Novirasputin
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 130
      • 13
      • 0
      • 186

      #22
      Originally posted by Black Jesus
      Some of them were definately borderline on the belt, keep in mind his beltline was also high.

      IMHO not really

      if you want to see high
      check out
      DLH


      but anyway this is irrelevent what we think. I am bias, so is Pantera and so on. The discussion turns to the following:

      1. what did the ref say about the trunks before the bell, because he ruled the warnings and deductions

      and then the question is
      do you think he was corrupt and in teh pocket of the promoter?

      You believe yes

      but i believe no cause as i said he didn't do AA any favors by not stopping the fight

      and if he was corrupt he had all the opportunities with borderline shots to stop the fight and DQ Miranda
      why even take chances that EM would land the KO punch?

      Furthermore

      if EM is being warned for borderline shots, illegal or no,
      why take the chance and give them a reason to get on his case?

      Comment

      • El Jesus
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2004
        • 9468
        • 553
        • 191
        • 17,604

        #23
        Originally posted by Novirasputin
        IMHO not really

        if you want to see high
        check out
        DLH


        but anyway this is irrelevent what we think. I am bias, so is Pantera and so on. The discussion turns to the following:

        1. what did the ref say about the trunks before the bell, because he ruled the warnings and deductions

        and then the question is
        do you think he was corrupt and in teh pocket of the promoter?

        You believe yes

        but i believe no cause as i said he didn't do AA any favors by not stopping the fight

        and if he was corrupt he had all the opportunities with borderline shots to stop the fight and DQ Miranda
        why even take chances that EM would land the KO punch?

        Furthermore

        if EM is being warned for borderline shots, illegal or no,
        why take the chance and give them a reason to get on his case?

        I didint say anything about corruption or anything like that, your talking to the wrong person.

        Comment

        • LiLHopkins
          The King of Uploads
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 3827
          • 185
          • 132
          • 10,755

          #24
          **** Abraham won that fight hands down. But that score could have been closer. It is kinda what and what for me. I think Miranda should have won it. Those penaties were not called for. And plus he had the chance to take Abraham out but did not go for it. I hope that there is a rematch.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP