Hamed vs Morales

[Exige Jr]

exige ur a good poster and all, but ur totally wrong..

MAB exploited NAZ.. the first round was like oooooo ****tt.. naz is an excellent entertainer and puncher with speed.. but he cant hang with the big boys sorry.. did u see MABs gameface? Doode looked like he was in there to kill..

i think morales wouldve knocked him out. He definately has the better chin n he would fight less carefull than MAB..

thats my 2cents..

Im totally wrong, but thats your 2 cents?

[.::|ULTIMATE|::.]

Awsome post. I want to add he fought beat the tough John Lowey, some Irish fighter that Morales beat handedly but got my respect in his performance against Morales. Especially the first round, where he rushed Morales, that took balls.

Morales and Barrera would have beat Hamed at any time.

Gonna have to try and find me this fight now, I never seen it.

[BrooklynBomber]

I would go with Morales.

[Vanilla Gorilla]

I apologise for having a social life on Saturday night.

Social life must mean im avoiding the question.

Anyway to answer your point, Naseem fought people who were at the time rated as top contenders to his title's. Its no use looking back now and saying "well they didnt turn out to be anything, so they arent 'names'"... If they were a top contender then Naseem faced them at the time. He was considered as the best Featherweight in the world up until he lost. Would you like to dispute this fact with me?

That is a bunch of crap. Again ...credible fighters ? none. Why ? because he fought tomatoe cans which made him look great then when he stepped up he got "EXPOSED". Exposed as a fraud.

And what happened after he lost ?
He went into hiding. Fraud. He was still young and in his prime when he lost to MAB. DOnt gimme that **** that his prime was in the mid nineties. He was just a kid then. Prime was post Kevin Kelley.

[Exige Jr]

That is a bunch of crap. Again ...credible fighters ? none. Why ? because he fought tomatoe cans which made him look great then when he stepped up he got "EXPOSED". Exposed as a fraud.

And what happened after he lost ?
He went into hiding. Fraud. He was still young and in his prime when he lost to MAB. DOnt gimme that **** that his prime was in the mid nineties. He was just a kid then. Prime was post Kevin Kelley.

Ok then, you can think that Naseem Hamed was prime after he fought Kelley... You have really little evidence to support that. In fact you have none, but whatever floats your boat.

The only person that is exposed is you, as having absolutely no knowledge on this fighter.

"What happened after he lost?
He went into hiding. Fraud"

Did he? I thought he fought Manuel Calvo to win back the title he lost to Barrera... Obviously me and the video evidence is wrong though.

[GTL]

so whats your explanation for him losing to MAB?

[jonestyson]

I personally thought the hamed barrera fight was a good fight, when emanual stewart tried to teach hamed how to BOX he lost it all. Before that, he didnt worry about a punch and could take a good one, yeah he went down a few times because of balance issues but barrera couldnt knock him out or get close. When hamed was crazy and threw punches from all angles, barrera would of got beat. My opinion. I think hamed should come back and fight both of them, I think he could be undisputed featherweight champ.

[eazy_mas]

ooo, nice one. attacking me instead of admitting naz fought nobodies.

nobodies is what you think but some fighter climb on top of the ladder to fight him. It as if you saying that belts dont count.

Here is Hamed title won, year and times he fought for it:

- EBU-Bantamweight, 1994 deafted once
- WBC International Super Bantamweight, 1994-1995, deafted it 6times.
- WBO Featherweight , 1995-200, deafted it for 16 times
- IBF Featherweight , 1997, deafted once but he won it the first time with 1st KO against Billy Hardy.
- WBC Featherweight, 1999, won Cesar Soto for the title but never deafted it.
- IBO Featherweight, 2002, after MAB loss.

If a guy deafted the WBO title 17 times is fake then i dont know what to say to you guy.

Nassem Hamed made some of his opponent look bad because he was dancing around. So it does not mean his opponenet where bad but sometimes a loss could take away the good thing you did e****ally if the other guy won impressivly.

[The Noose]

exige ur a good poster and all, but ur totally wrong..

MAB exploited NAZ.. the first round was like oooooo ****tt.. naz is an excellent entertainer and puncher with speed.. but he cant hang with the big boys sorry.. did u see MABs gameface? Doode looked like he was in there to kill..

i think morales wouldve knocked him out. He definately has the better chin n he would fight less carefull than MAB.. thats my 2cents..

I think the reason why Barrera won is because he fought such a controlled careful fight.
If Morales came straight at Naz he would have been caught with counters.
I dont think Morales was/is quick enough to catch Naz.

[xcaret]

Naz is a ****ing bum, cant believe so many people overrated that sack of ****, and its happening again with Amir Kahn, British boxers are ****ing bums and always overrated, over and out.