Toney dominated a guy Wlad struggled with

[AllEyesOpen]

I had him winning by 3 points without the point deduction, he also got rocked about 3 times in that fight, & for a blown up MW against "the hardest hitting" HW in the division that says alot, Toney won the fight plain & simple.

Edit; Also Toney won most rounds, just cause Peters lands a few half decent shots at the end of the round, doesn't mean he won them.

[DiegoFuego]

Yes, thank you. I'm glad not everyone is a ****ing moron here. You can have Toney winning, fine, but to say he won by more than three points is just ridiculous.

Also the last time I checked you aren't "dominating" the opponent when you get rocked several times in the fight, have to grab onto the ropes for assistance at one point (an illegal move Toney should have been warned for), and are forced to take 2-3 steps back everytime the opponent lands a jab.

Maybe Toney won (I had Peter by a close, close decision) but it wasn't by much.

how many times do I have to say it. Toney won almost every round against Peter although he did get rocked in round 5. But Wlad got dropped by Peter a few times and could have actually lost the fight. Toney was never in a position where he could have lost. He made that fight look easy.

[RAESAAD]

how many times do I have to say it. Toney won almost every round against Peter although he did get rocked in round 5. But Wlad got dropped by Peter a few times and could have actually lost the fight. Toney was never in a position where he could have lost. He made that fight look easy.

Say it until you are red in the face....not everyone agess with you and you are not always right.....hell you know the saying opinions are like *******s and everyone has one.

[RAESAAD]

you don't know **** about this sport as proven time and time again. you think Winky won clearly but think this fight was close???? biased as hell. you're worthless raesaad.

Now you know what you said here is just straight bull****......you just can't accept that some people disagree with you....actually most which leaves me with the majority.....try being a little more rational and not so gung ho....you are not always right bro simple and plain.

[realheavyhands]

some people dont realize how curropt this sport is .. under the queensbury rules it is a FACT toney won that fight.. its a damn shame

[vB Martin]

some people dont realize how curropt this sport is .. under the queensbury rules it is a FACT toney won that fight.. its a damn shame

Under the Queensbury rule #1 it was an illegal contest as the ring did not measure 24 feet though there was adequate space for a ring of the proscribed size.

The Queensbury rules were replaced damned near a hundred years ago and are no longer relevant.

[realheavyhands]

Under the Queensbury rule #1 it was an illegal contest as the ring did not measure 24 feet though there was adequate space for a ring of the proscribed size.

The Queensbury rules were replaced damned near a hundred years ago and are no longer relevant.

what was the size of the ring

[vB Martin]

what was the size of the ring

The size of the ring is as irrelevant as the Queensbury rules.