Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo Sees Another 6-7 Years Left in Career, Rules Out Foes at 175

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Elvelozpotosino View Post
    Why isn't he Ready? Remember, Canelo fought Mayweather when he was Berlanga's age. But y'all dismissed he was only 23 and throw shade at him

    He dared to be great at 23, Berlanga won't

    The only 23yr old that would dare is a much larger Benavidez yet he lost his chance RIGHT NOW since he is not a belt holder. Maybe after unifying 168 he will fight Benavidez. That's the fight I want to see
    Berlanga might be ready now, however I would like to see him face and defeat a top-10 guy first. At this point he hasn’t even seen the second round of a fight yet.

    You are correct that Canelo faced Floyd at 23 years old, however Canelo was also coming off an impressive, title-unifying win against Austin Trout.

    Comment


    • If he fights that long, there's no way he should miss anybody.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by tokon View Post
        So Canelo received a 6 month ban for what . . . . ?!

        And no Vada 24/7/365.

        And short notice contracts so the contracted random testing protocols are for minimal time.

        Canelo is definitely suspect imo.

        But you got yours and that's fine too. Thanks.
        again, the comprehension on this forum is slow. Read the sentences SLOWLY, word for word...

        Before 2019, Clenbuterol had no threshold. Hence the 6month ban. The new allowance is 2NG. Canelo had .6NG peak.

        Ask yourself, if you believe Clenbuterol is for cheating - for whatever use - why would WADA now allow a threshold. Before 2019, if you had .0033 blah blah your be held accountable and dealt with. You realize picograms and Nani grams have a huge differential, especially in the context for when the event happens. Nevertheless, why would WADA now allow cheating? If in theory Canelo needed Clen why would he stop and why would it stop being reported or why would WADA allow all sports this new benefit of doubt?

        The simple answers is that clever propaganda about meat consumption research not having validity is what Canelo haters pushed for the dummies. It is the same thing as Flat Earth Theorists challenging existing science for the world being round. These people actually exist and have done tests to try to disprove the world is round. Why are fans challenging meat contamination with in Mexico? Lol. WADA officially documents a problem there, not a random village of 15 people
        Last edited by Thuglife Nelo; 02-17-2021, 12:58 AM.

        Comment


        • Another 6-7 years as the p4p numero uno.

          Comment


          • Not sure they is enough fights at 168 to sustain that period of length.

            Need a few 175 guys to drop down then if they want the big $$$ looking at Bivol/Beterbiev

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
              Incorrect.


              Canelo Alvarez Announces VADA Will Test Him for PEDs Year-Round
              https://www.boxingscene.com/canelo-a...-round--128187
              In that case, if Canelo has continued on that program, I would be less su****ious of him.

              However, I do note that article is from may 2018. Wasn't it in the aftermath of the clenbuterol test fail when he was needi g to get relicenced? So doesn't necessarily confirm that he's remained in the program.

              But thanks for the info.
              Last edited by tokon; 02-17-2021, 05:04 AM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by tokon View Post
                In that case, if Canelo has continued on that program, I would be less su****ious of him.

                However, I do note that article is from may 2018. Wasn't it in the aftermath of the clenbuterol test fail when he was needi g to get relicenced? So doesn't necessarily confirm that he's remained in the program.

                But thanks for the info.
                Does any of that really matter? Murder is murder, there is no threshold for such crimes. You funna get locked up and sentenced! Where’s with WADA’s new 2019 ********* of 2ng allowance, Canelo did no wrong.

                So ask yourselves, why did WADA finally amend meat contamination worldwide and allow a threshold allowance? I theory wouldn’t every athlete exploit that? There answer is no, because advanced testing techniques don’t disclose difference from pills and meat contamination. That would be ****** for them to reveal how they catch innit?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by revelated View Post
                  I've said this before - and I won't repeat again.

                  Whoever holds The Ring championship is widely considered lineal champion.

                  TBRB went political and split off from The Ring years ago - but TBRB does not issue lineal and haven't for years - they simply rate fighters above #1, often improperly (it should be that whoever wins between #1 and #2 gets to be the top dog, but in many cases they skip steps and just gift it to whoever they like and disregard who they don't. They just got done disregarding WBA because they stripped Manny, which basically gives Ugas no fair opportunity; yet they're fine with WBC who did the same thing to Keef and many other fighters because of Canelo. Hypocrites.)

                  Your Wikipedia research tells you what TBRB believes to be true - not what the consensus was at the time.

                  Think about it.

                  If what you're saying is true, it means that Jeff Horn became lineal champion when he beat Manny Pacquiao. Something you know to be false.

                  Because Horn didn't win The Ring.

                  Because Manny didn't hold it.

                  SO while certain orgs looked at Manny as lineal after the third Bradley fight, the fact is he really wasn't.

                  When people look at whoever holds The Ring (most recently Teofimo), that guy is widely accepted as lineal champion.

                  Danny 'Swift' Garcia sparked Amir Khan's chin to unify WBC, WBA and The Ring.

                  Considered lineal champion.
                  Amir Khan never had the ring championship.. so if Danny won it after beating Amir then he won a vacant lineal title (according to you), which is what you're knocking TC for (lol)... you're doing all this typing and nothing you're saying makes sense or has anything to do with his resume at 147, which is my whole point in saying he's overrated


                  nothing you posted has anything to do with how TBRB operates their rankings btw

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Hot Shyt View Post
                    Amir Khan never had the ring championship.. so if Danny won it after beating Amir then he won a vacant lineal title (according to you), which is what you're knocking TC for (lol)... you're doing all this typing and nothing you're saying makes sense or has anything to do with his resume at 147, which is my whole point in saying he's overrated
                    "At The End Of The Day" , at the time, Amir Khan was considered to be lineal when Danny Swift beat him.

                    Nobody with sense highly rated Beltran when Crawford beat him.

                    Postol was highly rated when he shouldn't have been. He got crazy credit for beating Matthysse - same Matthysse that Garcia had already beaten, same Matthysse that had lost EVERY time he stepped up. Both he and Postol were 'eye test' fighters with B-level resumes.

                    Leading up to Garcia, Khan had smoked Zab (I say Zab quit mentally), Chino, and Paulie (who was overrated but talented). Lamont took jabs...of synthetic T in his ass which helped him beat Khan when he shouldn't have.

                    JUST the Judah alone was big enough that Amir Khan was thought to have bounced fully back from the Prescott knockout, which people started believing was just a fluke (it wasn't).

                    You don't understand how people were falling all over Amir Khan in 2009-2012. I was there. I heard people claiming this guy beats Floyd and Manny, greatest lightweight, greatest super lightweight, too much speed for anyone, they're all ducking him anyway, etc. Especially when he best Judah.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by eco1 View Post
                      Aunt Nana.

                      which resume? Loosing twice to an old Golovkin, Lara, even F Trout, lol, and getting gifts?

                      Dude, I come from the Duran-Hearns-Sugar-Hagler times. F Clenny is a cherrypicking diva! F him and his blind lovers.
                      Despite the fights you consider "losses" he won those and one draw with GGG, beat Danny Jacobs, Smith, Kovalev. You avoided the actual question, who over the last 5 years has a better resume? Nobody which is why you went on your little tirade. Anyway considering your bias I don't believe we can't have a civil discussion based on fact, so off you go old timer.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP