Thurman, Spence, and Hypocrisy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MONGOOSE66
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 7739
    • 1,609
    • 620
    • 29,199

    #21
    Originally posted by DaNeutral.
    If he makes a good point then make a new thread for that point. Why ignore the point of the thread by hiding behind a different fighter.

    And if we want to compare Thurman and Spence to Crawford can Thurman and Spence both also claim to be undisputed or even champions in 3 weight divisions?
    I guess honesty OFFENDS U. Dont worry, your boy Trump will be back.

    Comment

    • DaNeutral.
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2018
      • 10087
      • 1,665
      • 342
      • 144,794

      #22
      Originally posted by MONGOOSE66
      I guess honesty OFFENDS U. Dont worry, your boy Trump will be back.
      What we're you honest about? Is Crawford Not a 3 weight world champion? ARE Thurman or Porter or Spence?

      Ive got no issue with any of those 4, all good fighters but let's not try crap on the one that doesn't fight for the promoter you are a fan of. Respect them all. Or atleast make sense and take everything in to account for your hatred of non PBC Crawford.

      Dont pretend he has done nothing when he has done more than any of the others.

      Comment

      • MONGOOSE66
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2011
        • 7739
        • 1,609
        • 620
        • 29,199

        #23
        Originally posted by DaNeutral.
        What we're you honest about? Is Crawford Not a 3 weight world champion? ARE Thurman or Porter or Spence?

        Ive got no issue with any of those 4, all good fighters but let's not try crap on the one that doesn't fight for the promoter you are a fan of. Respect them all. Or atleast make sense and take everything in to account for your hatred of non PBC Crawford.

        Dont pretend he has done nothing when he has done more than any of the others.
        Come on now. U telling me that Crawford has fought more tuff opposition than Porter? Thurman, Spence? Pac? Delahoya? Mosley? He’ll even Mayweather fought more big name opponents even though they were past their prime.
        I like Crawford but he hasn’t done NOTHING as far as fighting the best. I could give a sheeit about promoters, managers or advisers. Fk them all.

        Comment

        • MPDKSAB
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2019
          • 1211
          • 145
          • 20
          • 50,781

          #24
          I don't remember people saying Keith was a hype job at any point in his career, let alone after those wins.

          I could careless about any P4P list, but boxing is about how you get moved & who you're with. Iirc Spence was on the P4P list as early as beating Lamont Peterson! I remember when Broner was on the P4P list. Shìt is like an attention list. You can literally talk your way to a list. But the list in itself is a whole nother discussion.

          I'll say this tho to add context tho. Errol beat Lamont, Mikey, & Brook before those guys mentioned in the OP. & to me he beat Brook when he was arguably the best 147 at the time. & his Brook win TO ME is better than both his aforementioned wins in the OP! So then adding Porter & DSG it's not unreasonable at all for him to be on the mythical list.

          Comment

          • Floyd is TBE
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2016
            • 3239
            • 737
            • 1,097
            • 27,507

            #25
            He was overrated as ****, just like Porter is still overrated as ****. I don't know why people are still doing this bit where beating Porter makes you an elite fighter.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP