Comments Thread For: Hearn Cautions The WBO: Fury-Joshua is Bigger Than The Belts

[KnickTillDeaTh]

You're right it has been put to bed. AJ has long been contractually obliged to have his fights shown exclusively by Sky in the UK. Any offer that required him to breach that contract was an obvious waste of time.

Thats what negotiations are for. They didn't negotiate, they turned down.

[Mooshashi]

I am shocked and ashamed but I find myself in complete agreement with Eddie.

[Squared.Circle]

Thats what negotiations are for. They didn't negotiate, they turned down.

How can they negotiate when the other team refuses to negotiate? Lol "no emails, no phone calls, no meetings, accept the offer or no deal".

[TheCell8]

He's right. They need to consider the legacy implications here.

[KnickTillDeaTh]

How can they negotiate when the other team refuses to negotiate? Lol "no emails, no phone calls, no meetings, accept the offer or no deal".

You're mixing different events different times. The $50 million offer which was Spear headed by showtime, was being fully communicated. You're talking about the previous discussions that were based on Hearn and AJ making offers. In those times, shelley finkle and Wilders team disputed what Hearn said. Theres no proof that either were telling the truth or lying. That was he said she said. Stick to the 50 million offer please, I made no mention of previous offers. And my comment was simply to show that the 50 million offer was real and it was turned down, which is indisputable by the facts and record. You are the 2nd person to bring up other offers as if it changes the fact that AJ turned down the 50 million offer.

[Cool Scant]

Doesn’t need to because matchroom make legit offers, not false ones for publicity

Don't Uk fans get sick of being so bias. You do no Haymon is more credible than Hearn concerning large fight purses and gross revenue. If you DONT think all Hearn and AJs negotiations with wilder was a publicity stunt you are truly a deluded radical nationalist

[Cool Scant]

Sounds similar to how Ducktay Whiner refused to sign a contract because there was no date or venue...but signs a contract with Fury for less money, no titles...that had no date or venue

The difference between the Ducktay Whiner negotiations and the Tyson Fury negotiations are....the word negotiations "no emails, no phone calls, no meetings, accept the offer". Team AJ and Fury have been in direct contact for weeks. You know, NEGOTIATING.

Fact is, Ducktay Whiner has turned down multiple lucrative offers, they've had at least one contract (that they asked for) on the table, and their only reasons are contradictory or childish.

You Ducktay Whiner fangirls are simply bitter that your hero's comments like "one face, one name, one champion" and "I'll freeze AJ out the division" have come back to bite him on his twerking booty; he's been frozen out of the big fights and is no longer given the slightest considerations in talks of "one face, one name, one champion".

My new favourite saying: karma is a bítch, and her stripper name is The Gypsy King

the $50M offer AJ ducked came before any of the lies and propaganda you mentioned smh

[Squared.Circle]

You're mixing different events different times. The $50 million offer which was Spear headed by showtime, was being fully communicated. You're talking about the previous discussions that were based on Hearn and AJ making offers. In those times, shelley finkle and Wilders team disputed what Hearn said. Theres no proof that either were telling the truth or lying. That was he said she said. Stick to the 50 million offer please, I made no mention of previous offers. And my comment was simply to show that the 50 million offer was real and it was turned down, which is indisputable by the facts and record. You are the 2nd person to bring up other offers as if it changes the fact that AJ turned down the 50 million offer.

"You have to accept the fight and then we'll send you a (draft) contract"..."there is no point in meeting it would be non-productive".

That's Finkel's version of "negotiating"...verbally accept or there's no deal. And yes, that's regarding the $50m.

https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-weve-called-team-wilders-bluff-they-refuse-meet--127612

They say "here's $50m", Hearn asks for the necessary details in a draft contract, they refuse to send a draft contract or enter negotiations. There was nothing of any substance to turn down. If you can't read between the lines and see a PR stunt when it's right in front of you, flashing strobe lights into your eyes, then there's not much else that can be said

If, say, somebody receives a contract that they've requested but say "no thanks", or go to a meeting where an offer is laid out on the table but say "no thanks"...then that would be turning something down. Not "verbally accept or there's no deal".

[Squared.Circle]

the $50M offer AJ ducked came before any of the lies and propaganda you mentioned smh

As I said above, the $50m was a non-starter. "Verbally accept and we'll negotiate".

If Ducktay Whiner fans want to cling on to a blatant PR stunt, then that's on them. I get it though, saying that AJ avoided Ducktay Whiner is the only significant win of his entire career. So yea, I get it

[KnickTillDeaTh]

"You have to accept the fight and then we'll send you a (draft) contract"..."there is no point in meeting it would be non-productive".

That's Finkel's version of "negotiating"...verbally accept or there's no deal. And yes, that's regarding the $50m.

https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-weve-called-team-wilders-bluff-they-refuse-meet--127612

They say "here's $50m", Hearn asks for the necessary details in a draft contract, they refuse to send a draft contract or enter negotiations. There was nothing of any substance to turn down. If you can't read between the lines and see a PR stunt when it's right in front of you, flashing strobe lights into your eyes, then there's not much else that can be said

If, say, somebody receives a contract that they've requested but say "no thanks", or go to a meeting where an offer is laid out on the table but say "no thanks"...then that would be turning something down. Not "verbally accept or there's no deal".

You posted an article from the first few days when the offer was initially sent. That was before Espinoza got involved. You cherry picked an article that showed Hearns intial media response, if this is the base line of your argument, you are severely out gunned. What happened next? How did it end? If I show you, will you cut this schit out with this BS, and admit it? Because I dont want to waste my time. Yes or no answer will suffice.