Comments Thread For: Tommy Fury Expects Tyson To Have 'Easy' Time With Anthony Joshua

[REDEEMER]

Is this the same recycled interview again?
Is this even a story- Tommy Fury backs Tyson Fury to beat AJ?

Calls it Tyson’s easiest fight but then goes onto say what a great fight it will be.

The Fury clan has a definite faulty gene where they cannot help themselves from contradictory statements, it’s as if they are wired to have conflicting opinions in the same breath .

Seems like Peter is the only sensible one and he claims it’s a 50/50 fight .

[Inspired]

Fury Joshua is going to be epic. We don’t need the non boxing fans in America to take note. The ones who love the sport will, but I’m just happy to see wilder frozen out after all his BS!! He can now go and find a true contender to fight and actually earn a shot for once!

he'll become a mandatory to one of the belts when he beats Helenius or Charles Martin.

[Rapscallion]

For those who cite Fury's illegal gloves, whether Fury had illegal gloves may not have made a difference in the outcome of the fight. Why? Because Wilder could not cope with Fury's swarming style. In fact, Wilder did the very thing Fury wanted, which was to retreat from rather than to advance toward and remain in close to Fury - close enough to keep his (Wilder's) head safe from Fury's fully leveraged blows. Furthermore, in my opinion, Wilder was not going to win the February 2020 fight regardless of the gloves Tyson Fury wore as Wilder's performance that night was that bad.

[kafkod]

WILDER WITH HIS SWAPPED FED EX GLOVES!!!! Follow link!
EXPLAIN THIS!!

Whats the problem? According to the 'Fury-Faithful' the Nevada Athletic commission did their job. Nothing to see here.

I seem to remember you singing a different tune when Dillian Whyte did exactly the same thing before the Rivas fight as Wilder did right there ... switched to a pair of back-up gloves at the last minute without giving his opponents trainer a chance to inspect them or be present to watch them being put on.

Why the double standard's, pal? You biased or what?

[kafkod]

Don’t forget Hearn had some amateur bouts under a false name!!! Haha

Canelo's former promoter, Oscar De La Hoya, claims to have done a bit of boxing in the past too. Not on the same level as Fast Eddie though.

[Tonyu]

His family what else is he going to say. Boxrec putting this down as an article is irrelevant.

[Bain01D]

Canelo's former promoter, Oscar De La Hoya, claims to have done a bit of boxing in the past too. Not on the same level as Fast Eddie though.

Haha brilliant!! I favour the Essex golden boy over the fake Mexican/American fella

[Jack Rivers]

AJ will be his toughest fight ever. I don't see AJ giving up like he did with Ruiz... Let's be real here though. AJ gave up cause he was concussed. His body could not do what his mind wanted nor could it keep up. He had no answer which anyone in his situation would have the same outcome. He was punch drunk.

[JayCho]

The Fury clan has a definite faulty gene where they cannot help themselves from contradictory statements, it’s as if they are wired to have conflicting opinions in the same breath .

Seems like Peter is the only sensible one and he claims it’s a 50/50 fight .

I like Peter Fury as he’s always unbiased. However they should not interview him about Hughie Fury haha

[1hourRun]

I seem to remember you singing a different tune when Dillian Whyte did exactly the same thing before the Rivas fight as Wilder did right there ... switched to a pair of back-up gloves at the last minute without giving his opponents trainer a chance to inspect them or be present to watch them being put on.

Why the double standard's, pal? You biased or what?

I'm not particularly informed on what is going on here bro, so I have to reserve any comment regarding this matter. Why was this not address by the media earlier?

But I'll tell you this, I think its foolish to assume that Nevada State Athletic commission and the BBBofC follow the exact same protocols, or that the contracts signed by two separate parties ( Wilder-Fury and Whyte-Rivas ) would be identical.

I doubt, that both situations would be identical, evident in the fact that these 'Fedex-gloves' came from through the mail, in contrast to what I think ( I'm not sure ) that Whyte may have used someone elses gloves? I forget, but common sense is not being applied in your reasoning.