why does the ring mag rank canelo # 1 at 168?

[QueensburyRules]

dont derail my thread, he beat callum who lost to ryder therefore he is not # 1 at 168

- -U undefeated #1 Dum here.

P4p stuff!

[Marvlus Marv]

dont derail my thread, he beat callum who lost to ryder therefore he is not # 1 at 168

"Don't derail my thread" Wtf are you, an 8 yr old girl? You can't even answer a simple question. I knew you'd wriggle youir sorryass out of that. I'll happily leave your precious little thread before you wet yourself.

[saopaulo]

"Don't derail my thread" Wtf are you, an 8 yr old girl? You can't even answer a simple question. I knew you'd wriggle youir sorryass out of that. I'll happily leave your precious little thread before you wet yourself.

f-uck off u weakling f-aggot

[Ray*]

Callum smith was the number 1 guy at 168, he beat him and also claimed the WBC belt in doing so. He has the WBA/WBC belt at that weight. The other champions at that weight class haven’t really done anything. I mean BJS best wins are at 160, and Plant what has he done? Benavidez has waste his talent there, by not making weight. So Canelo is the natural number 1 guy there.

[Cobratu]

Because he is you dumbass

[Marvlus Marv]

f-uck off u weakling f-aggot

Sorry, who are you? Go back to listening to your Lil Wayne CD. There's a good boy.