Breadman is correct: “truth..GGG didn’t win the 1st fight (against Canelo)”
Collapse
-
I misread it too until I saw your post and went back and read it again
I thought that was weird as previously Bread has always stated he thought Golovkin won the first fight.Comment
-
The best case for canelo is a draw if every swing round goes to canelo.
8-4 Golovkin if every swing round goes to him.
Btw. I dont know why breadman is so respected. Does he even train anyone at the moment?
He did a decent job with Jrock but they parted ways after his second KO loss.
His fight predictions are also usually wrong lol.Comment
-
Yeah, George Foreman thought Pierre Cotzer made him feel hungry because the word apartheid sounded like a pie.Tyson will see me in Bolivian.But I was responding to a poster who said Canelo won because, hence me saying nobody agreed.Comment
-
I’ve always said the Draw was justified. None of them did remarkable things in the first fight to show dominance. Or one could say GGG felt he was the better sole jabber, ok he proved that, and Canelo proved he was the better power puncher? I mean I don’t know why fans get to so upset over the Draw. Both fighters agreed to run it back for the fans. The rematch was significantly better. Benefit of doubt goes to Canelo because he showed two styles in two different fights that he had NEVER done before. Canelo haters don’t have to appreciate that, but the judges did, and at close rangeThe best case for canelo is a draw if every swing round goes to canelo.
8-4 Golovkin if every swing round goes to him.
Btw. I dont know why breadman is so respected. Does he even train anyone at the moment?
He did a decent job with Jrock but they parted ways after his second KO loss.
His fight predictions are also usually wrong lol.Comment
-
But the other 2 judges agreed. That's not the same as GGG v Canelo I. One judge had Canelo winning. One judge had GGG by a round. One judge had it a draw. I thought Canelo won but a draw is acceptable. You GGG fans can't fathom a draw even though the 1 card your fighter won was only by 1 rdComment
-
They don’t like that Bread had to explain the simple concept of swing rounds. GGG fans will forever ignore the nature of swing rounds vs Canelo. To them jabs is more than enough, even if GGG had the worst compubox of his career in that fight which didn’t represent his previous fightsBut the other 2 judges agreed. That's not the same as GGG v Canelo I. One judge had Canelo winning. One judge had GGG by a round. One judge had it a draw. I thought Canelo won but a draw is acceptable. You GGG fans can't fathom a draw even though the 1 card your fighter won was only by 1 rdComment
-
I'm not particularly a GGG fan,nor do i hate Canelo,but the consensus view is that Golovkin won the first fight ,and Canelo is the cash cow.Canelo is the young star who's marketable at a level that Golovkin can never be.He wasnt losing on points, but nobody thought he won that fight, and nobody thought he drew with Floyd.Be honest with yourself.But the other 2 judges agreed. That's not the same as GGG v Canelo I. One judge had Canelo winning. One judge had GGG by a round. One judge had it a draw. I thought Canelo won but a draw is acceptable. You GGG fans can't fathom a draw even though the 1 card your fighter won was only by 1 rdComment
Comment