Comments Thread For: Joshua: I Have Four Major Belts, Fury Has One - And I'll Take It From Him!

[wildman]

Fury has the one that counts. The WORLD championship belt. That's the only one that matters. All the rest are just meal tickets for a bunch of alphabet crooks.

[DaNeutral.]

We all know if Wilder held the IBO it would held in much higher regards amongst the salty Joshua/Hearn haters on this forum.

Its the "crappy" title but its a title, it comes with a belt, it is something that passes hands when the holder of it is beaten, just like any of the others.

Joshua haters, mainly American Wilder fans although the majority of hate on these boards is from Americans who seem to despise non Americans achieving anything in the sport, will pour salt on anything they can think of.

Wilder could of held that crappy belt himself but he is a pu66y and ducked Joshua.

[DaNeutral.]

Fury has the one that counts. The WORLD championship belt. That's the only one that matters. All the rest are just meal tickets for a bunch of alphabet crooks.

So you don't want undisputed? You must be a PBC Wilder fan.

[Toffee]

Fury has the one that counts. The WORLD championship belt. That's the only one that matters.

WWE doesn't count.

[famicommander]

Heavyweight titles in order of how much I give a rat's ass about them:

1. Lineal, represented best by TBRB and CBZ
(enormous gap)
2. The Ring (lost a lot of credibility but they're still better than rest because they rank the whole division, not just contenders for their own belt)
(big gap)
3. WBC (but they're declining rapidly with all this "Franchise" nonsense)
4. IBF (at least they follow their own rules, mostly. Their rankings are ass and they ruin a lot of potentially big fights, though)
5. WBO
6. WBA (Super)
(massive gap)
7. WBA (Regular)
8. WBC, IBF, or WBO interim
9. IBO
10. WBA (interim)

Fury has the top 3 pieces of the crown as far as I care. Joshua has 4, 5, 6, and 9. Joshua has a bunch of trinkets that were stripped from Fury. Fury is the heavyweight champion.

[puroylan]

It's time for Fury to reclaim all the major belts again!

[wildman]

Why do many of you out there give any credibility at all to these alphabet belts? If a guy is the "undisputed" champion, and one of these joke organizations decide to withdraw their recognition because he refused to fight some meaningless mandatory, then matched up two nobodies for their vacant belt, the real champ wouldn't be the "undisputed" champion any more? So which ever nobody won that BS belt would detract from the real champion's claim to the title? Don't laugh.....this has actually happened before. Everyone would still know who the real champion was. Having all four belts may be a nice goal, but it isn't really necessary in some cases to have a true WORLD champion.

[DaNeutral.]

It’s a minor title. It’s not acknowledged by Ring Magazine and the other 4 organizations.

A British title? Or a world title?

[kingstip9]

The only reason Joshua has the belt is because fury relinquished them after going on a road to depression.

So well done on beating Klitschko after Klitschko was dethroned by the Gypsy king.

He ended Klitschkos winning streak and did the same too wilder.

He’s switched on atm, and when he’s on, he would be hard to beat.

Looking forward to this fight.

[_Rexy_]

Three belts, Anthony. You have three major belts and one unrecognized paperweight.