Canelo's defence is underrated, he would dodge a lot of Froch's shots.
And if Groves, who's not Canelo, had Froch down and seriously buzzed when he hit him in the first fight's opening round, Alvarez takes him out IF he manages to land a couple of good ones on that chin.
Canelo's defence is underrated, he would dodge a lot of Froch's shots.
And if Groves, who's not Canelo, had Froch down and seriously buzzed when he hit him in the first fight's opening round, Alvarez takes him out IF he manages to land a couple of good ones on that chin.
Either way, it would be a great fight.
Yeah Canelo beats the version of Froch who KO'd Groves, but I'm talking about a prime Froch, the guy who walked down Taylor & smashed Pascal to bits.
Canelo's defence is underrated, he would dodge a lot of Froch's shots.
And if Groves, who's not Canelo, had Froch down and seriously buzzed when he hit him in the first fight's opening round, Alvarez takes him out IF he manages to land a couple of good ones on that chin.
Either way, it would be a great fight.
His defense is pretty much what is brought up first when talking about Canelo. Literally no one underrates it.
Froch was slow and not slick or quick as Canelo but had a good chin, decent power and throw a lot of volume in his fights. Froch was beat only by a very good boxer in Kessler and a great one and neither of them fights like Canelo or are similar in size. At this stage i would put my money on today's Canelo against 2010-12 Froch.
Comment