Anthony Joshua bests Jack Dempsey as an ATG

[removed]

Joshua batters any of these old timers.

The sport has moved on.

[Marchegiano]

Jesus, what an asinine thread.

Jack Dempsey LITERALLY wrote the book on boxing.

His book is still the book that people use to train fighters til this day.

The guy fought when there were far more registered fighters than there are now, even if it wasn't all inclusive.

Just read this before you embarrass yourself more.

https://www.amazon.com/Arc-Boxing-De.../dp/0786493879

Did you read my post or just get pissy and start running your mouth?

Your post ranges from irrelevant out of ring nonsense to subjects I already addressed.

The public wanted Wills, so, your inclusive bull****, who do you mean? Jack wasn't inclusive? Duh.

More registered boxers changes who was the best of the era does it?

Some book from 09. Yes, I'm sure that's what I am missing. Did you check your author's sources? This man found some long lost 1920s articles did he? Or is it the same **** anyone who uses primary sources already knows and knows well?

[Marchegiano]

The OP has several right points however he proves why he’s still the worst poster on the forum ,just because he is and some posters actually like this guy ? Really ? Ha

Hi bud, **** you

[Marchegiano]

Hahaha, you’re a damn fool! You really have a hard on for Dempsey. You and the rest of the casuals go on believing this nonsense. Dempsey would have KTFO Marciano’s wife beating ass.

It's more you actually. You and the rest of his fans. I've held no cards. I think you're a very smart poster and a very ****ty fan.

I think I could argue for Jack's supremacy better than anyone who has posted yet because I have this amazing ability to not get so pissy I can't think and use a ****** point as my crux.

But him book doe....****ing dumb, take a bow D3vil.

But him on film doe.... c'mon dog, you can do better.

You know you can do better than they have. Of these half-assed excuses for his resume the best I've seen came from you in other threads.

That said, grandpa's opinion holds a little more weight than but him book doe, however, it's still a pretty bad point to hang your hat on.

IMO, the best reasoning without using an excuse I've seen yet in any thread came from Anthony. When he said more or less **** the resume, dempsey had traits. tough, hit hard, could go a long time, etc.

Tell me again all about Nat the liar and plagiarist's opinion. Like that's not a dumbass thing to hang your hat on.

Tell me more about Casey's made up bull**** we easily flushed out. That's worth going to bat for.

Seems to me Dempsey attracts short sighted halfassers.

Marciano would murder Dempsey. He beat all the best of his era, and, they're all finer names than anyone Jack ever beat.

Not only did Rocco beat the LHWs of his time and not get KTFO by them, he beat a LHW who did better at HW then the LHW who beat Jack. What's good? At LHW Tunney has an arguement. At HW Charles is the clear better champion with way more defenses and a name worth a **** at the time.

[JakeTheBoxer]

I don`t even count Dempsey and Jack Johnson as champions of anything.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

[LeOoze]

Didn't read all that but I do know Dempsey fought better opposition than Marciano, would beat him in his prime, and his much higher in ATG lists.

[Kezzer]

Was this post created a few years ago and the guy literally just remembered to click submit?

“Championship Record
Has a record of 7-0-0 (6 KO’s) in world title fights.”

Just to bring you upto date - he has now fought in ten world title fights, won 9, lost 1. He has an extra KO to his name, this happened last Saturday night. You should look it up on YouTube as it was quite a nice knockdown actually.

[The D3vil]

Dempsey gets ktfo by Bertebiev if we are being honest. There's levels to this ****

And you're basing that on what?

Dempsey beat Jess Willard who was 6'6" and 255lbs half to death. Broke his ribs, jaw, and cause severe skull fractures

Yeah, there's levels to this shxt alright.

[The D3vil]

Did you read my post or just get pissy and start running your mouth?

Your post ranges from irrelevant out of ring nonsense to subjects I already addressed.

The public wanted Wills, so, your inclusive bull****, who do you mean? Jack wasn't inclusive? Duh.

More registered boxers changes who was the best of the era does it?

Some book from 09. Yes, I'm sure that's what I am missing. Did you check your author's sources? This man found some long lost 1920s articles did he? Or is it the same **** anyone who uses primary sources already knows and knows well?

Well considering that Mike Silver is a much more respected boxing historian than you, then I'd say that his lifetime of respected worth means more than an idiot on a website.

And I also respect Mike Tyson, who patterned his whole style after Jack Dempsey.

Why don't you ask him if he's one of the greats?