Originally posted by boogbx
View Post
Wallin is 30 and has won 21 of 23 fights, fighting nobody of note except Fury (professionally -- he lost twice to Joshua in the amateurs). Therefore he must be great because he almost beat Fury.
Pulev is 39 and has won 28 of 30 fights. His two losses were to Hall of Famer Klitschko and tonight's KO at the hands of AJ. He didn't have a brilliant amateur career, but a decent one. Has beaten the middle-tier likes of Derek Chisora and Hughie Fury. This doesn't make him brilliant, but they are better fighters than Wallin has beaten.
I don't see any reason to agree with your claim that Wallin would murder Pulev.
Pulev ain't all that, but in terms of boxing fundamentals he is superior to Wilder, the beating of whom Fury's recent acclaim is based on..
Comment