Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson Disagrees With Mayweather: Boxing Does Not Have Too Many Belts

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    It’s funny because what Floyd said is true. Almost every single fight, there is a belt around someone’s waist and your thinking, ok, WTF is this belt for if it’s not a major known title fight, LOL!!!!

    Comment


    • #12
      I’d beg to differ. There are way too many champs to keep track of. All of these alphabet organizations with their “WBA Gold,” WBC Diamond,” “WBC Franchise” and all of their other “regular” titles are primarily for collecting fees. The title of being a champ has become diluted because of all these belts.

      Comment


      • #13
        Spence has 2 belts. Pac has 1 belt. Crawford has 1 belt. Jamal James has 1 belt. Ugas has 1 belt. 6 belts just in the 147 division. Totally ridiculous!!

        Comment


        • #14
          Fighters deserve to be paid but theses belts weren't created to help them. It's for the promotors who can claim that they are putting on a championship fight to attract viewers. I think both guys are right. Fighters who aren't the top in their divisions deserve to be paid more than they have in the past but there are way too many belts and sanctioning bodies.

          Comment


          • #15

            Comment


            • #16
              I feel like Tyson be getting a pass for the nonsensical things he says because of his supposed "wisdom."

              Or so it seems.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by JcLazyX210 View Post
                Nope. I don’t support this view point champ.
                Pretty much this

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                  Fighters deserve to be paid but theses belts weren't created to help them. It's for the promotors who can claim that they are putting on a championship fight to attract viewers. I think both guys are right. Fighters who aren't the top in their divisions deserve to be paid more than they have in the past but there are way too many belts and sanctioning bodies.
                  Spot on. The more belts..the more "sanctioning fees" the WBC/WBO/WBA/IBF can charge. And promoters can parade around promoting a "champ".

                  These belts are a joke and Tyson is mad AF he's still fighting for handouts at 50 while Floyd has a different Lambo for every day of the week.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by markther View Post
                    It’s funny because what Floyd said is true. Almost every single fight, there is a belt around someone’s waist and your thinking, ok, WTF is this belt for if it’s not a major known title fight, LOL!!!!
                    It's like tee-ball. You get a participation prize...show up and you're a champ !

                    Yikes

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Drew Bundini Br View Post
                      Spence has 2 belts. Pac has 1 belt. Crawford has 1 belt. Jamal James has 1 belt. Ugas has 1 belt. 6 belts just in the 147 division. Totally ridiculous!!
                      And one IBO vacant belt . So 7 potential champions.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP