Why did Pacquiao refuse random blood testing from 2009-2011, yet..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roadblock
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 14031
    • 3,535
    • 428
    • 108,713

    #101
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
    Why did Pacquiao make Brandon Rios do VADA drug testing with no cutoff dates?
    Its another piece of evidence that they just ignore, the party is over everybody knows how it all went down .

    Any pac fanboy care to write down actual proven effort on a part of Manny to make the fight.

    I can write a list of what Floyd did too actually make the fight, beginning with agreeing to all Mannys demands, approaching Manny personally with a cash offer higher than Mannys prior purse, finishing with it was Floyd that again approced Manny in person and made the fight.

    What did Manny do, a commercial, sue the Mayweather's and say NO to the only demand Floyd made, he did absolutely nothing to make the fight happen.

    Comment

    • djtmal
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2008
      • 12993
      • 1,275
      • 11
      • 39,097

      #102
      Originally posted by Roadblock
      Its another piece of evidence that they just ignore, the party is over everybody knows how it all went down .

      Any pac fanboy care to write down actual proven effort on a part of Manny to make the fight.

      I can write a list of what Floyd did too actually make the fight, beginning with agreeing to all Mannys demands, approaching Manny personally with a cash offer higher than Mannys prior purse, finishing with it was Floyd that again approced Manny in person and made the fight.

      What did Manny do, a commercial, sue the Mayweather's and say NO to the only demand Floyd made, he did absolutely nothing to make the fight happen.
      Of course a die hard Floyd boy can come up with 50 excuses, um facts, for why Floyd didn't back out of a fight with Manny, but once again people here wrote down and pulled up hard facts proving Floyd's ost crusade as nothing more than a farcical demand specifically designed to assassinate Manny's character, so he can have a legit excuse to back out of the Manny fight in 2010. He was able to back out cool, but he still lost the character assassination battle in court and had to save face for years with the roadblocks any time the subject of fighting Manny came up. Manny had to take this amount of money, Manny had to leave TR and join TMT. All roadblocks. Negro please just make the fight. All Floyd had to do was grow a pair and make the fight before the time stamp on the whole thing expired, and he failed, and you guys want to forever make it Manny's fault. Gtfoh.

      To add insult to injury when they finally did fight what 6 or 7 years later, Manny was ko'd by Marquez, already past his prime, and Floyd was popped with an illegal IV with god knows what in it, and a gym full of drug cheats. The fight itself was not one of Floyd's best not even close so why you cats feel the need to defend his janky actions here speaks volumes.

      If you don't want to accept it, cool, but give it up man this isn't a court of law and nobody really cares about your excuses. That's you Floyd boys problem. You think your word is the be all and end all. You ain't that special dude.
      Last edited by djtmal; 12-01-2020, 07:17 AM.

      Comment

      • Dosumpthin
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2016
        • 2340
        • 149
        • 77
        • 25,361

        #103
        Originally posted by djtmal
        Of course a die hard Floyd boy can come up with 50 excuses, um facts, for why Floyd didn't back out of a fight with Manny, but once again people here wrote down and pulled up hard facts proving Floyd's ost crusade as nothing more than a farcical demand specifically designed to assassinate Manny's character, so he can have a legit excuse to back out of the Manny fight in 2010. He was able to back out cool, but he still lost the character assassination battle in court and had to save face for years with the roadblocks any time the subject of fighting Manny came up. Manny had to take this amount of money, Manny had to leave TR and join TMT. All roadblocks. Negro please just make the fight. All Floyd had to do was grow a pair and make the fight before the time stamp on the whole thing expired, and he failed, and you guys want to forever make it Manny's fault. Gtfoh.

        To add insult to injury when they finally did fight what 6 or 7 years later, Manny was ko'd by Marquez, already past his prime, and Floyd was popped with an illegal IV with god knows what in it, and a gym full of drug cheats. The fight itself was not one of Floyd's best not even close so why you cats feel the need to defend his janky actions here speaks volumes.

        If you don't want to accept it, cool, but give it up man this isn't a court of law and nobody really cares about your excuses. That's you Floyd boys problem. You think your word is the be all and end all. You ain't that special dude.
        No matter how hard you try fact still remains Manny refused random blood testing. Team Manny on record in 2012 still stating 3 dates to have blood drawn

        1. Start of training camp
        2. 30 days before the fight
        3. After the fight.

        This was stated in 2012 by Arum regarding the mega fight.

        No matter how you try to spin it this is a fact. You can't dispute it. Its a fact.

        Comment

        • Monzon99
          Banned
          • Oct 2019
          • 2485
          • 199
          • 13
          • 53,288

          #104
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          Are you dumb enough to not realize Manny could have simply taken the harmless blood test... JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE DID?
          because haymon and floyd controlled usada and tygart and surely would have rigged a fake positive test to eliminate Pac as a threat. Are you ****** enough to not see through all of floyd's duck excuses and roadblocks? Has to avenge his losses. Has to leave Arum and sign with Haymon. Has to give blood an hour before the fight. Pac takes American money back to Philippines....


          Your ****** hero is a self confessed coward.

          Comment

          • Monzon99
            Banned
            • Oct 2019
            • 2485
            • 199
            • 13
            • 53,288

            #105
            here is the fraud weather escape all over again. Fraud fans read it and weep...

            Negotiations with Manny Pacquiao Wiki

            On December 5, 2009, ESPN reported that eight-division world champion Manny Pacquiao signed a contract to fight Mayweather on March 13, 2010. Shortly afterward, Pacquiao denied ever signing a contract to fight Mayweather, telling FanHouse, "There are still some things that need to be negotiated."[128]

            According to Yahoo! Sports, an eight-page contract was sent on December 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank, representing Pacquiao, that proposed a 50–50 financial split between the sides for a fight to take place on March 13, 2010.

            The eight-page agreement was so detailed that it indicated which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather). It detailed that the bout would have been on HBO Pay-Per-View at a cost of $59.95. Billing was to be "Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, presented by Top Rank, Golden Boy Promotions, Mayweather Promotions and M-P Promotions in association with [approved sponsors and the site]." The contract also called for both fighters to submit to Olympic-style drug testing.

            A Mayweather-Pacquiao bout at that time was expected to be the largest-grossing fight in history, in which total revenues could reach $300 million. Experts predicted the fight would sell between 2.5 million and 3 million pay-per-views in the U.S.[129]

            In a video titled "Boxing Legend Freddie Roach Updates Us On Pacquiao" uploaded to YouTube on December 11, 2009, Pacquiao's trainer, Freddie Roach, revealed the first hint about Mayweather's request for Olympic-style drug testing, telling roving reporter Elie Seckbach, "I hear negotiations are a little shady. Schaefer and them are unhappy about something. They want Olympic-style drug testing. I said, 'Yeah, no problem.' I said, 'Whatever you want.' Since we accepted that, now they're running scared again."[130]

            On December 13, 2009, Pacquiao's adviser, Michael Koncz, said Mayweather's request for Olympic-style drug testing was a laughing matter and they had no concerns whatsoever about it. "Our reaction is, 'So what?' We know Manny doesn't take any illegal drugs or anything. And none of this is getting under Manny's skin or anything. I'm here with Manny, and to him, it's like a joke. It's a laughing matter," said Koncz.

            After reports had surfaced that both parties had agreed to all terms, Golden Boy Promotions released a press release on December 22, 2009, revealing that Pacquiao was unwilling to comply with the Olympic-style drug testing requested by Team Mayweather. The following day, Bob Arum, Top Rank founder and CEO, declared the fight was off and Pacquiao would be facing a different opponent:

            We appeased Mayweather by agreeing to a urine analysis at any time, and blood testing before the press conference and after the fight. Mayweather pressed for blood testing even up to the weigh-in. He knew that Manny gets freaked out when his blood gets taken and feels that it weakens him. This is just harassment and, to me, just signaled that he didn't want the fight.

            Arum told David Mayo of the Grand Rapids Press. Not long after declaring that the fight was off, Arum had a change of heart and offered Mayweather a 24-hour take-it-or-leave-it deadline to accept Team Pacquiao's terms for drug testing. Top Rank sent out a press release explaining their position on Mayweather's request for random Olympic-style drug testing. In it, Arum said Pacquiao was willing to submit to as many random urine tests requested, but as far as random blood tests were concerned, he was only willing to subject himself to 3 tests—one in January, one 30 days from the bout (no later than February 13) and one immediately after the fight:

            Let's be very clear on the real issues we differ on. It's not about being tested....It's about who does the testing and the scheduling of the procedures....The major issue related to the testing rests with which independent agency will administer these tests. The United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) cannot do it because they will not amend its procedures to accommodate the blood testing schedule we have outlined. USADA, under its guidelines, would have the right to administer random blood tests as many times as they want up to weigh-in day and that is ludicrous.

            Freddie Roach told Lance Pugmire of the Los Angeles Times on December 22 that he would prefer for Pacquiao to give his final blood sample a week before the bout and no later than 72 hours before.

            On December 28, 2009, video from an episode of HBO's Pacquiao-Hatton: 24/7 surfaced on the internet showing Pacquiao giving blood in the weeks leading up to his May 2, 2009, bout with Ricky Hatton. Documents confirmed that the video was recorded on April 8, 2009, 24 days prior to the fight and past the 30-day cut-off date that Pacquiao had demanded for a Mayweather fight.

            Both sides agreed to enter into mediation on January 7, 2010, in hopes of coming to an agreement on the blood testing issue. Retired federal judge Daniel Weinstein, who successfully resolved a prior dispute between Top Rank and Golden Boy Promotions, would again act as mediator. Two days later, after hours of negotiating during mediation, Arum declared that the fight was officially off after Mayweather refused to agree to a 24-day cut-off date. Mayweather revealed that he offered a 14-day cut-off date to Team Pacquiao, but it was rejected.

            Mayweather Promotions CEO Leonard Ellerbe declared on January 18, 2010, that random blood and urine testing will be implemented in all of Mayweather's future fights, regardless of the opponent. On February 13, 2010, in an exclusive interview with David Mayo of The Grand Rapids Press, Mayweather said, "I gave him [Pacquiao] a chance, up to 14 days out. But my new terms are all the way up to the fight. They can come get us whenever, all the way up to the fight, random drug test. That's what it is."[128]

            After the failed negotiations, both fighters moved on to instead face other opponents. On March 13, 2010, Pacquiao defeated Joshua Clottey via unanimous decision, and on May 1, 2010, Mayweather beat Shane Mosley by a unanimous decision.

            Pacquiao was quoted by the Manila Bulletin on May 20, 2010, as saying, "As long as they're not getting a large amount of blood, I am willing to give out blood as close to two weeks before the fight." On the same day, Mayweather revealed that he would be taking the rest of 2010, and possibly 2011, off.

            On June 10, 2010, Oscar De La Hoya said negotiations for a Mayweather-Pacquiao fight were close to being finalized. Speaking to Spanish-language sport show República Deportiva, De La Hoya briefly talked about the current status of negotiations and, with a grin on his face, said that the two sides were extremely close to making the biggest fight in boxing a reality. "These negotiations have been real difficult for various reasons, but we're really close to finalizing the contracts, even though they've been complicated," he commented. "Today, I can't really talk about the negotiations, but we're really close." A week later, Golden Boy Promotions CEO Richard Schaefer refuted De La Hoya's comments. "I saw those quotes as well, and I had no idea what Oscar was talking about. And I called him up and asked him about them, and he said that he was misquoted," Schaefer explained to Lem Satterfield of FanHouse.

            Arum declared on June 30, 2010, that there were no longer any issues and the decision was up to Mayweather. "That's all been resolved," Arum stated to Kevin Iole of Yahoo! Sports regarding the dispute over random blood and urine drug testing. Arum would also tell the Las Vegas Review-Journal, "There's no longer any issues....The question is whether Mayweather is willing to fight this year." He would reiterate that comment to the Manila Bulletin, stating, "It's now up to Mayweather if he wants to fight."

            On July 13, 2010, Arum issued a July 16 midnight deadline for Mayweather. "Mayweather has until the end of the week. He could wait until the last minute. If it's Friday [July 16] and it's 11 p.m., and he says we have a deal, we have a deal," Arum would explain to Dan Rafael of ESPN. On July 15, 2010, Top Rank's website unveiled an official countdown to the deadline entitled "Money" Time: Mayweather's Decision.

            As soon as the deadline for Mayweather's response expired, Arum held a conference call. Arum revealed to the media that the negotiations he had been referring to consisted of a series of conversations with HBO Sports President Ross Greenburg. He also revealed that there was no actual direct communication with any representative from Team Mayweather or Golden Boy Promotions:

            I had a couple of conversations with Ross [Greenburg] and I laid out all the terms that would be acceptable to our side and I also informed him about the concession that Manny had made regarding drug testing. He got back to me in a couple of weeks and told me that he had had discussions with Al Haymon, representing Floyd Mayweather, and that everything looked good and we were nearing a resolution...The subsequent conversations with Ross detailed to me conversations he had with Al Haymon. Nowhere was the name Richard Schaefer or Golden Boy mentioned, although I read, as you all did, Oscar's statement that a deal was close, so I assumed from that Haymon was keeping Schaefer and Golden Boy abreast of the situation.


            Mayweather in 2011
            During a Q & A session following his opening statement, Arum further explained, "We have never talked to anybody on the Mayweather side and all conversations on our part were through Ross Greenburg and he reported on all conversations on the Mayweather side from Al Haymon."

            On July 19, 2010, Ellerbe denied that negotiations ever took place and nothing was ever agreed on. Ellerbe stated:

            Here are the facts: Al Haymon, Richard Schaefer and myself speak to each other on a regular basis and the truth is no negotiations have ever taken place nor was there ever a deal agreed upon by Team Mayweather or Floyd Mayweather to fight Manny Pacquiao on November 13. Either Ross Greenburg or Bob Arum is not telling the truth, but history tells us who is lying.

            Three days later, Schaefer backed Ellerbe's statement that negotiations never took place.

            When asked via e-mail for his response to Ellerbe's denial that negotiations ever took place, Greenburg would respond to ESPN's Dan Rafael with the following reply: "As always we have no comment."

            Regarding comments he made suggesting that contracts for the mega-fight were close to being finalized, De La Hoya told BoxingScene.com on July 26, 2010:

            I think I said it because I get the question asked so many times that, obviously, I was fed up and tired of it and I just said like, yeah, yeah, it's gonna get made. So it was a quick answer that I should have obviously thought about. But, obviously, negotiations weren't going on. Nothing was going on.

            Also on July 26, Greenburg released a statement saying that he had been negotiating with a representative from each side since May 2, 2010. "I had been negotiating with a representative from each side since May 2, carefully trying to put the fight together. Hopefully, someday this fight will happen. Sports fans deserve it," Greenburg revealed in a prepared statement sent out to select members of the media.

            Schaefer again supported Ellerbe's denial of negotiations, and challenged both Greenburg and Arum to take lie detector tests. "I think it's unfortunate that Ross made that statement. I fully stand behind the statement I made. I have not negotiated with Ross and I am not aware of any negotiations that have taken place," Schaefer told ESPN.[131]

            On July 8, 2011, ESPN reported that Pacquiao was willing to agree to random drug testing—but not by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA). "We have agreed in the Pacquiao camp to unlimited random testing done by a responsible, neutral organization," Arum told Yahoo.

            We don't believe USADA is a neutral organization. I don't think anybody's test is as vigorous as the test administered by the Olympic Organization. And we can arrange for the Olympic Organization to handle the test under the supervision of the Athletic commission respective of the state where the fight is going to be held.[132]

            However, the following day, Pacquiao's top adviser, Michael Koncz, stated that Pacquiao had never agreed to testing until fight day. "Will we give blood five days, seven days before the fight? You know, that's something I have to talk to Manny about, but we have nothing to hide," Koncz said.

            ESPN reported on January 20, 2012, that Mayweather called Pacquiao on the telephone and spoke directly with him in the Philippines. "He ask about a 50/50 split and I told him no that can't happen, but what can happen is you can make more money fighting me then [sic] you have made in your career," Mayweather said.[133] Mayweather offered to pay him a flat fee of $40 million for a proposed fight but would not allow him to share in the revenue. Pacquiao said, "I spoke to Floyd...and he offered me an amount," Pacquiao said. "He didn't talk about the pay-per-views here and that's it. I can't agree with that. I told him I agree with 55 and 45 (split)."[134]

            Pacquiao appeared on the ESPN program First Take on September 20, 2012, and said he had no problem with the drug-testing issue. "No problem," Pacquiao said. "Whatever he wants to do." Pacquiao said he was willing to be tested even on the night of the fight. "No problem," he said. "Even the night of the fight. No problem."

            On December 20, 2013, The Daily Telegraph reported that Mayweather said Pacquiao's association with promoter Bob Arum is the reason why the bout will not happen. "We all know the Pacquiao fight, at this particular time, will never happen, and the reason why the fight won't happen is because I will never do business with Bob Arum again in life, and Pacquiao is Bob Arum's fighter," Mayweather said.[135]

            Comment

            • Monzon99
              Banned
              • Oct 2019
              • 2485
              • 199
              • 13
              • 53,288

              #106
              Originally posted by Roadblock
              Dont even go to dumbville kid, its not a school yard fight, there is no way know Floyd would know Manny was going to say NO RANDOM PEDS TESTING.

              So how does wanting extra PED testing becoming ducking but saying NO TEST is wanting the fight.

              Youre just a dumb hater, you have no evidence yet I have a mountain you cant answer.
              Read it and weep...

              Negotiations with Manny Pacquiao
              See also: Mayweather vs. Pacquiao
              On December 5, 2009, ESPN reported that eight-division world champion Manny Pacquiao signed a contract to fight Mayweather on March 13, 2010. Shortly afterward, Pacquiao denied ever signing a contract to fight Mayweather, telling FanHouse, "There are still some things that need to be negotiated."[128]

              According to Yahoo! Sports, an eight-page contract was sent on December 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank, representing Pacquiao, that proposed a 50–50 financial split between the sides for a fight to take place on March 13, 2010.

              The eight-page agreement was so detailed that it indicated which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather). It detailed that the bout would have been on HBO Pay-Per-View at a cost of $59.95. Billing was to be "Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, presented by Top Rank, Golden Boy Promotions, Mayweather Promotions and M-P Promotions in association with [approved sponsors and the site]." The contract also called for both fighters to submit to Olympic-style drug testing.

              A Mayweather-Pacquiao bout at that time was expected to be the largest-grossing fight in history, in which total revenues could reach $300 million. Experts predicted the fight would sell between 2.5 million and 3 million pay-per-views in the U.S.[129]

              In a video titled "Boxing Legend Freddie Roach Updates Us On Pacquiao" uploaded to YouTube on December 11, 2009, Pacquiao's trainer, Freddie Roach, revealed the first hint about Mayweather's request for Olympic-style drug testing, telling roving reporter Elie Seckbach, "I hear negotiations are a little shady. Schaefer and them are unhappy about something. They want Olympic-style drug testing. I said, 'Yeah, no problem.' I said, 'Whatever you want.' Since we accepted that, now they're running scared again."[130]

              On December 13, 2009, Pacquiao's adviser, Michael Koncz, said Mayweather's request for Olympic-style drug testing was a laughing matter and they had no concerns whatsoever about it. "Our reaction is, 'So what?' We know Manny doesn't take any illegal drugs or anything. And none of this is getting under Manny's skin or anything. I'm here with Manny, and to him, it's like a joke. It's a laughing matter," said Koncz.

              After reports had surfaced that both parties had agreed to all terms, Golden Boy Promotions released a press release on December 22, 2009, revealing that Pacquiao was unwilling to comply with the Olympic-style drug testing requested by Team Mayweather. The following day, Bob Arum, Top Rank founder and CEO, declared the fight was off and Pacquiao would be facing a different opponent:

              We appeased Mayweather by agreeing to a urine analysis at any time, and blood testing before the press conference and after the fight. Mayweather pressed for blood testing even up to the weigh-in. He knew that Manny gets freaked out when his blood gets taken and feels that it weakens him. This is just harassment and, to me, just signaled that he didn't want the fight.

              Arum told David Mayo of the Grand Rapids Press. Not long after declaring that the fight was off, Arum had a change of heart and offered Mayweather a 24-hour take-it-or-leave-it deadline to accept Team Pacquiao's terms for drug testing. Top Rank sent out a press release explaining their position on Mayweather's request for random Olympic-style drug testing. In it, Arum said Pacquiao was willing to submit to as many random urine tests requested, but as far as random blood tests were concerned, he was only willing to subject himself to 3 tests—one in January, one 30 days from the bout (no later than February 13) and one immediately after the fight:

              Let's be very clear on the real issues we differ on. It's not about being tested....It's about who does the testing and the scheduling of the procedures....The major issue related to the testing rests with which independent agency will administer these tests. The United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) cannot do it because they will not amend its procedures to accommodate the blood testing schedule we have outlined. USADA, under its guidelines, would have the right to administer random blood tests as many times as they want up to weigh-in day and that is ludicrous.

              Freddie Roach told Lance Pugmire of the Los Angeles Times on December 22 that he would prefer for Pacquiao to give his final blood sample a week before the bout and no later than 72 hours before.

              On December 28, 2009, video from an episode of HBO's Pacquiao-Hatton: 24/7 surfaced on the internet showing Pacquiao giving blood in the weeks leading up to his May 2, 2009, bout with Ricky Hatton. Documents confirmed that the video was recorded on April 8, 2009, 24 days prior to the fight and past the 30-day cut-off date that Pacquiao had demanded for a Mayweather fight.

              Both sides agreed to enter into mediation on January 7, 2010, in hopes of coming to an agreement on the blood testing issue. Retired federal judge Daniel Weinstein, who successfully resolved a prior dispute between Top Rank and Golden Boy Promotions, would again act as mediator. Two days later, after hours of negotiating during mediation, Arum declared that the fight was officially off after Mayweather refused to agree to a 24-day cut-off date. Mayweather revealed that he offered a 14-day cut-off date to Team Pacquiao, but it was rejected.

              Mayweather Promotions CEO Leonard Ellerbe declared on January 18, 2010, that random blood and urine testing will be implemented in all of Mayweather's future fights, regardless of the opponent. On February 13, 2010, in an exclusive interview with David Mayo of The Grand Rapids Press, Mayweather said, "I gave him [Pacquiao] a chance, up to 14 days out. But my new terms are all the way up to the fight. They can come get us whenever, all the way up to the fight, random drug test. That's what it is."[128]

              After the failed negotiations, both fighters moved on to instead face other opponents. On March 13, 2010, Pacquiao defeated Joshua Clottey via unanimous decision, and on May 1, 2010, Mayweather beat Shane Mosley by a unanimous decision.

              Pacquiao was quoted by the Manila Bulletin on May 20, 2010, as saying, "As long as they're not getting a large amount of blood, I am willing to give out blood as close to two weeks before the fight." On the same day, Mayweather revealed that he would be taking the rest of 2010, and possibly 2011, off.

              On June 10, 2010, Oscar De La Hoya said negotiations for a Mayweather-Pacquiao fight were close to being finalized. Speaking to Spanish-language sport show República Deportiva, De La Hoya briefly talked about the current status of negotiations and, with a grin on his face, said that the two sides were extremely close to making the biggest fight in boxing a reality. "These negotiations have been real difficult for various reasons, but we're really close to finalizing the contracts, even though they've been complicated," he commented. "Today, I can't really talk about the negotiations, but we're really close." A week later, Golden Boy Promotions CEO Richard Schaefer refuted De La Hoya's comments. "I saw those quotes as well, and I had no idea what Oscar was talking about. And I called him up and asked him about them, and he said that he was misquoted," Schaefer explained to Lem Satterfield of FanHouse.

              Arum declared on June 30, 2010, that there were no longer any issues and the decision was up to Mayweather. "That's all been resolved," Arum stated to Kevin Iole of Yahoo! Sports regarding the dispute over random blood and urine drug testing. Arum would also tell the Las Vegas Review-Journal, "There's no longer any issues....The question is whether Mayweather is willing to fight this year." He would reiterate that comment to the Manila Bulletin, stating, "It's now up to Mayweather if he wants to fight."

              On July 13, 2010, Arum issued a July 16 midnight deadline for Mayweather. "Mayweather has until the end of the week. He could wait until the last minute. If it's Friday [July 16] and it's 11 p.m., and he says we have a deal, we have a deal," Arum would explain to Dan Rafael of ESPN. On July 15, 2010, Top Rank's website unveiled an official countdown to the deadline entitled "Money" Time: Mayweather's Decision.

              As soon as the deadline for Mayweather's response expired, Arum held a conference call. Arum revealed to the media that the negotiations he had been referring to consisted of a series of conversations with HBO Sports President Ross Greenburg. He also revealed that there was no actual direct communication with any representative from Team Mayweather or Golden Boy Promotions:

              I had a couple of conversations with Ross [Greenburg] and I laid out all the terms that would be acceptable to our side and I also informed him about the concession that Manny had made regarding drug testing. He got back to me in a couple of weeks and told me that he had had discussions with Al Haymon, representing Floyd Mayweather, and that everything looked good and we were nearing a resolution...The subsequent conversations with Ross detailed to me conversations he had with Al Haymon. Nowhere was the name Richard Schaefer or Golden Boy mentioned, although I read, as you all did, Oscar's statement that a deal was close, so I assumed from that Haymon was keeping Schaefer and Golden Boy abreast of the situation.


              Mayweather in 2011
              During a Q & A session following his opening statement, Arum further explained, "We have never talked to anybody on the Mayweather side and all conversations on our part were through Ross Greenburg and he reported on all conversations on the Mayweather side from Al Haymon."

              On July 19, 2010, Ellerbe denied that negotiations ever took place and nothing was ever agreed on. Ellerbe stated:

              Here are the facts: Al Haymon, Richard Schaefer and myself speak to each other on a regular basis and the truth is no negotiations have ever taken place nor was there ever a deal agreed upon by Team Mayweather or Floyd Mayweather to fight Manny Pacquiao on November 13. Either Ross Greenburg or Bob Arum is not telling the truth, but history tells us who is lying.

              Three days later, Schaefer backed Ellerbe's statement that negotiations never took place.

              When asked via e-mail for his response to Ellerbe's denial that negotiations ever took place, Greenburg would respond to ESPN's Dan Rafael with the following reply: "As always we have no comment."

              Regarding comments he made suggesting that contracts for the mega-fight were close to being finalized, De La Hoya told BoxingScene.com on July 26, 2010:

              I think I said it because I get the question asked so many times that, obviously, I was fed up and tired of it and I just said like, yeah, yeah, it's gonna get made. So it was a quick answer that I should have obviously thought about. But, obviously, negotiations weren't going on. Nothing was going on.

              Also on July 26, Greenburg released a statement saying that he had been negotiating with a representative from each side since May 2, 2010. "I had been negotiating with a representative from each side since May 2, carefully trying to put the fight together. Hopefully, someday this fight will happen. Sports fans deserve it," Greenburg revealed in a prepared statement sent out to select members of the media.

              Schaefer again supported Ellerbe's denial of negotiations, and challenged both Greenburg and Arum to take lie detector tests. "I think it's unfortunate that Ross made that statement. I fully stand behind the statement I made. I have not negotiated with Ross and I am not aware of any negotiations that have taken place," Schaefer told ESPN.[131]

              On July 8, 2011, ESPN reported that Pacquiao was willing to agree to random drug testing—but not by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA). "We have agreed in the Pacquiao camp to unlimited random testing done by a responsible, neutral organization," Arum told Yahoo.

              We don't believe USADA is a neutral organization. I don't think anybody's test is as vigorous as the test administered by the Olympic Organization. And we can arrange for the Olympic Organization to handle the test under the supervision of the Athletic commission respective of the state where the fight is going to be held.[132]

              However, the following day, Pacquiao's top adviser, Michael Koncz, stated that Pacquiao had never agreed to testing until fight day. "Will we give blood five days, seven days before the fight? You know, that's something I have to talk to Manny about, but we have nothing to hide," Koncz said.

              ESPN reported on January 20, 2012, that Mayweather called Pacquiao on the telephone and spoke directly with him in the Philippines. "He ask about a 50/50 split and I told him no that can't happen, but what can happen is you can make more money fighting me then [sic] you have made in your career," Mayweather said.[133] Mayweather offered to pay him a flat fee of $40 million for a proposed fight but would not allow him to share in the revenue. Pacquiao said, "I spoke to Floyd...and he offered me an amount," Pacquiao said. "He didn't talk about the pay-per-views here and that's it. I can't agree with that. I told him I agree with 55 and 45 (split)."[134]

              Pacquiao appeared on the ESPN program First Take on September 20, 2012, and said he had no problem with the drug-testing issue. "No problem," Pacquiao said. "Whatever he wants to do." Pacquiao said he was willing to be tested even on the night of the fight. "No problem," he said. "Even the night of the fight. No problem."

              On December 20, 2013, The Daily Telegraph reported that Mayweather said Pacquiao's association with promoter Bob Arum is the reason why the bout will not happen. "We all know the Pacquiao fight, at this particular time, will never happen, and the reason why the fight won't happen is because I will never do business with Bob Arum again in life, and Pacquiao is Bob Arum's fighter," Mayweather said.[135]

              Comment

              • ShoulderRoll
                Join The Great Resist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 56328
                • 10,185
                • 5,035
                • 763,445

                #107
                Originally posted by djtmal
                Of course a die hard Floyd boy can come up with 50 excuses, um facts, for why Floyd didn't back out of a fight with Manny, but once again people here wrote down and pulled up hard facts proving Floyd's ost crusade as nothing more than a farcical demand specifically designed to assassinate Manny's character, so he can have a legit excuse to back out of the Manny fight in 2010. He was able to back out cool, but he still lost the character assassination battle in court and had to save face for years with the roadblocks any time the subject of fighting Manny came up. Manny had to take this amount of money, Manny had to leave TR and join TMT. All roadblocks. Negro please just make the fight. All Floyd had to do was grow a pair and make the fight before the time stamp on the whole thing expired, and he failed, and you guys want to forever make it Manny's fault. Gtfoh.

                To add insult to injury when they finally did fight what 6 or 7 years later, Manny was ko'd by Marquez, already past his prime, and Floyd was popped with an illegal IV with god knows what in it, and a gym full of drug cheats. The fight itself was not one of Floyd's best not even close so why you cats feel the need to defend his janky actions here speaks volumes.

                If you don't want to accept it, cool, but give it up man this isn't a court of law and nobody really cares about your excuses. That's you Floyd boys problem. You think your word is the be all and end all. You ain't that special dude.
                Why did Pacquiao make Brandon Rios do VADA testing without cutoff dates? He is not the commission.

                Comment

                • Real King Kong
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 12029
                  • 460
                  • 24
                  • 105,905

                  #108
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                  just like your last Captain-Save-A-Hoe performance... I asked you a simple/logical/relevant question... and you crawled up your own (fat) ass to hide

                  any reason for that, Captain ?




                  FACT: everyone can see you are ducking that question Captain

                  FACT: whenever a lying scumbag needs a hero... there you are, frantically waving your pom-poms

                  that aint no coincidence LMAO
                  Fact: you raised a question to dodge the fact you were wrong and got called out for it. Suddenly you went digging in your sweatpants pocket for a straw man to hide behind lol. There’s more dignity in admitting you made a mistake and moving on.

                  Comment

                  • aboutfkntime
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 47370
                    • 1,631
                    • 3,563
                    • 391,308

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Monzon99
                    because haymon and floyd controlled usada and tygart and surely would have rigged a fake positive test to eliminate Pac as a threat. Are you ****** enough to not see through all of floyd's duck excuses and roadblocks? Has to avenge his losses. Has to leave Arum and sign with Haymon. Has to give blood an hour before the fight. Pac takes American money back to Philippines....


                    Your ****** hero is a self confessed coward.



                    you fkn wack-job !!

                    FACT: pac could have simply taken the harmless blood test, just like everyone else

                    everyone knows why he didn't

                    Comment

                    • aboutfkntime
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 47370
                      • 1,631
                      • 3,563
                      • 391,308

                      #110
                      Originally posted by Real King Kong
                      Fact: you raised a question to dodge the fact you were wrong and got called out for it. Suddenly you went digging in your sweatpants pocket for a straw man to hide behind lol. There’s more dignity in admitting you made a mistake and moving on.




                      FACT: that is a logical... legitimate... OBVIOUS... question...

                      FACT: you cannot answer that logical, legit, OBVIOUS, question...

                      which is yea, hilarious

                      IF, what you say is true... that Manny finally agreed to random blood tests in 2012...

                      then, how come the pathetic excuses that Pacquiao used to duck Mayweather... were not used to duck Brandon Rios?

                      never... mentioned... once... LMAO

                      FACT: EVERYONE can see that you have ducked that question on NUMEROUS occasions

                      FACT: NOBODY else stepped up either LMAO


                      you rescue failed, Captain-Save-A-Hoe...



                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP