Better fighter: Crawford or Fury?

[Boxing-1013]

This sounds like a Jalen Rose thread

[Shadoww702]

Crawford by far.

[Shadoww702]

[Shadoww702]

Crawford by far.

Got one last one for you and then I'll stop before I get WOKED

[champion4ever]

Crawford is the better fighter. It's just that he is fighting on the wrong side of the street with a very sparse roster and stable in Top Rank. Come out of her Terence. Go to the PBC where you could help cement your legacy by fighting the very elite and best at welterweight.

[_original_]

Fury's has wins over Wlad and Wilder, Crawford's combined resume doesn't even come close to those two wins.

[Sid-Knee]

Fury's win over Wlad alone is better and will remain better than Crawford's entire career. Crawford isn't good enough to put that kind of fighter on his win column. Especially doing so overseas.

As for technique, of course Crawford is going to look the sharper of the two due to the size Fury carries around. But he isn't nor ever will be on Fury's level. Crawford is a good fighter and nothing more with a incredibly poor resume. When he steps up (If) you'll see the true quality of Crawford. And it won't be the level most claim it to be.

[Sid-Knee]

Fury isn’t fit to clean Crawford’s shoes.

Crawford reminds me of Ray Leonard in his prime.

Yeah, no.

Fury will be remembered for what he's achieved. Crawford isn't even known now with his shocking resume, let alone years after he's retired.

[Lupara]

are we talking boxing skills?

Crawford by a few country miles

*shrugs*