I say Fury, he is more proven. Crawford is technically better but still to date he hasnt proven he is the best in his division. I dont think there is much doubt Fury is the best HW. AJ will be a big mountain to climb but Id say the odds are he gets it done and I kind of like AJ more.
Better fighter: Crawford or Fury?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Fury would never win this poll, slick, black affacan ameecans from the hood are nsb's favourites, and he's at 147!?
But fact is Crawford is a midget and a bum beater, Fury would end his life in one round and has WAY better wins than fricking Ricky Burns and the corpse of Kell Brook.
Get of Crawford nutsComment
-
-
-
Fury would never win this poll, slick, black affacan ameecans from the hood are nsb's favourites, and he's at 147!?
But fact is Crawford is a midget and a bum beater, Fury would end his life in one round and has WAY better wins than fricking Ricky Burns and the corpse of Kell Brook.
Get of Crawford nutsLast edited by Godsfly; 11-15-2020, 03:37 AM.Comment
-
Maybe its the fact that fury needed steriods to win previous fights? The guy is too shady to be taken seriously with any real gold standard boxer. Even aj is higher. How technical can you be when you have been known to cheat. Coke, mental illness, steroids. Cheating. I like fury too but if you are not a total idiot and honest the guy is a absolute mess.....
Fury has UNPRECEDENTED achievement there, there isno precident, nobody has ever come back like that.
As far as the nandrolone stuff goes, I don't like it, but I also don't know if it's even true. Here's what I do know, Fury went after the establishment in the UK, he started talking about untouchable groups and he rattled cages, shortly after there's suddenly this talk of failed tests from years prior that we're never mentioned before.... Hmmm...
Since he's come back he's been a good boy and hasn't challenged the establishment and now it's all been forgotten... Hmmm...
It's almost like someone "had a word"Comment
Comment