Should Canelo have more losses than Loma?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Divine Hammer
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 7661
    • 376
    • 4
    • 37,824

    #11
    Originally posted by Al Broker
    The best part is that legends age well like fine wine, and as long as Canelo continues to win his style with be studied in gyms for years to come. In other words, your opinion will "clearly" not matter for future use.
    wrong. only thing that will be studied is how overrated he was and how all of his best wins were extremely controversial. if canelo is such a great champ then why are his top wins all controversial and close???????? he was even losing according to all media and most fans against an old past prime kovalev before the KO!! hahahahahhahaha give me a break.

    Comment

    • Divine Hammer
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2013
      • 7661
      • 376
      • 4
      • 37,824

      #12
      Originally posted by Mr.365
      nah he isn't your White Hopes (Lomachenko, Derev, Kovalev, G) Usyk exposed & Tyson getting smoked against Ruiz + Team Canelo
      hahahaha in ur dreams. tyson easily embarrassing ruiz and usyk will be #1 p4p soon! get a grip. loma was robbed, ggg was robbed TWICE!!!! kovalev was robbed against ward, etc etc. only way to win is via robbery. punk!

      Comment

      • Mr.365
        Undisputed Champion
        • Oct 2018
        • 1233
        • 77
        • 153
        • 36,030

        #13
        Originally posted by Divine Hammer
        hahahaha in ur dreams. tyson easily embarrassing ruiz and usyk will be #1 p4p soon! get a grip. loma was robbed, ggg was robbed TWICE!!!! kovalev was robbed against ward, etc etc. only way to win is via robbery. punk!
        KKKovalev got slept by boxing's Lord & Savior GOATnelo Alvarez u dummy. Olek ****e against Derek Chisora. Munguia, Andrade or Jermall retiring G dumbo

        Comment

        • Thuglife Nelo
          Banned
          • Dec 2018
          • 26836
          • 1,299
          • 1,822
          • 654,176

          #14
          Originally posted by Divine Hammer
          wrong. only thing that will be studied is how overrated he was and how all of his best wins were extremely controversial. if canelo is such a great champ then why are his top wins all controversial and close???????? he was even losing according to all media and most fans against an old past prime kovalev before the KO!! hahahahahhahaha give me a break.
          Boxing isnt complicated at all. Athleticism isnt measured like sprinters but moreso grit. In essence boxing only comes down to how well you take a punch and natural born fighting. Thats why its a niche sport. More importantly i say all this because all new gen elite boxers admire Canelo and many current and previous gen boxers have no problem saying Canelo is P4P #1. Thats not theory. Its general practice, literally. You can ignore the truth, but boxers have no reason to praise him nor is there a trend whom think he gets "gifts." Boxers would be ****** not to see this yet somehow fans can create theory?

          Comment

          • Thuglife Nelo
            Banned
            • Dec 2018
            • 26836
            • 1,299
            • 1,822
            • 654,176

            #15
            Originally posted by Divine Hammer
            hahahaha in ur dreams. tyson easily embarrassing ruiz and usyk will be #1 p4p soon! get a grip. loma was robbed, ggg was robbed TWICE!!!! kovalev was robbed against ward, etc etc. only way to win is via robbery. punk!
            Loma was robbed in the Salido fight right? Surely youre not referring to the Lopez fight.

            Comment

            • BillyBoxing
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 7454
              • 488
              • 62
              • 50,228

              #16
              Originally posted by Al Broker
              Lol. Youve openly hated on Canelo many times so this subtext to insinuate that boxing wasnt fair to Loma but for Canelo yes then let this sink in.

              1.) Doesnt matter if cards are "fishy." There are no narratives to prove his skills dont compete with other elites. If Canelo fought like DSG, stylistically, every fight then maybe you could prove his style doesnt own up to cards. There are many fighters whom wouldnt be able to catch Lara with consecutive body shots on the ropes for 12 rounds, but Canelo did.

              2.) Canelo has never performed like Loma has for the first 7 rounds like Loma did. GGG, Jacobs, Kovalev would all be the same in punching power for Lopez comparison. In fact, many fans of GGG and Kovalev would find it offrnsive comparing their power to Lopez.
              I'm not insinuating that boxing has not been fair to Loma but most likely that Boxing has been VERY generous to Canelo.

              It does matter if cards are fishy because cards make the winner of the fight.
              Canelo had been some weird cards behind him (Floyd draw, Byrd card ect...).

              Comment

              • QueensburyRules
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2018
                • 22971
                • 2,555
                • 18
                • 187,708

                #17
                Originally posted by BillyBoxing
                Canelo has been clearly beaten by TBE,
                then "80%" thought he lost GGG 1 and it's well reported that most of the mexican crowd thought he lost to Juarez in his 5th pro fight (DRAW).

                He has had 3 VERY CLOSE fights vs Trout, Lara, GGG 2.

                He walked out of it with only one loss when he could theorically be 5/6 losses.


                Loma has been beaten clearly ONCE, by Lopez, and has been in one close fight, Salido (SD/most people scored it a draw), I won't write that much about Salido's weight/low blows fools.

                Loma got two losses ROFL

                I think it's pretty funny and some fighters like Canelo are pretty well rewarded by judges.
                Canelo even pulled a draw card vs Floyd wich is madness.

                I think Canelo is def not the P4P king and people are being fooled by the GBP scorecards and matchmaking.

                Not hating on Canelo, I think he's good for boxing and I'm glad that we can enjoy his skills. He's fighting everybody, dude has steel balls, RESPEK, but hey, those cards are fishy. WHAT YALL THINK?
                - -What U Billy Goat family say?

                Comment

                • BillyBoxing
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 7454
                  • 488
                  • 62
                  • 50,228

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mammoth
                  Why does it matter who should have more losses out of the two? Weird thread...
                  Just an exemple of how boxing judging is weird and there might be corruption.

                  Canelo could have more losses than Shawn Porter ROFL.

                  Comment

                  • BillyBoxing
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 7454
                    • 488
                    • 62
                    • 50,228

                    #19
                    Originally posted by QueensburyRules
                    - -What U Billy Goat family say?
                    Putting your useless bum troll a77 on ignore.

                    Comment

                    • BillyBoxing
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 7454
                      • 488
                      • 62
                      • 50,228

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Cobratu
                      More “what if”

                      IF Loma had power he might be undefeated.

                      IF Linares had a chin he would still be LW champ.

                      IF Chavez Jr had heart he might be one of the best at 168.

                      IF Wilder had skill he would have never lost to fury.
                      You didn't get the point.

                      The competences of the judges has nothing to do with the quality of the boxer.

                      But they will determine their legacy.

                      Porter is 3 losses but have been less dominated in a boxing ring than Canelo IMO.

                      You have to beat Canelo 9-3 rounds to get a decision, Floyd did it and get a majority decision.

                      There is corruption in boxing IMO, nothing to do with "if Linares had a chin".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP