Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Kell Brook Motivated To Do a 'Calzaghe-Lacy' Job on Crawford

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Griever0730 View Post
    Why does everytime one of the Brits fights an American, they always compare it to Lacy-Calzaghe? None of those Brits compared have ever been anywhere as good as Calzaghe and none of the Americans compared have ever been near as bad and overrated as Lacy. They needa let that nonsense go. It's like it's hung onto for some sense of superiority over Americans. That ish lame af. Like both guys, but Crawford gonna do a job on Brook. Simple as that.
    It’s an inferiority complex so many British lower class males, sports fans, have with America. And it tends to be English (Calzaghe is Welsh) more so than the Scots, Ulstermen, and the Welsh. It’s just as simple as that, an inferiority complex. They see that fight as one of the few victories......and you just can’t tell them that Lacey wasn’t highly regarded, I guess that mucks with the fantasy

    Comment


    • #32
      Kell lacks defensive skill. He is going to eat alot of flush power shots. We will see how much he can take.

      Comment


      • #33
        Goddamn the Brits are obsessed with referencing this fight. There are way more instances of Brits getting exposed by Americans, and others, than vice versa.

        Comment


        • #34
          You should have said you were gonna do a Randolph Turpin vs. Sugar Ray Robinson. You look a whole lot more like Turpin, and Crawford fights closer to Robinson than he does to Lacy

          Comment


          • #35
            why do brits do this everytime and assume every american is jeff lacy?

            Comment


            • #36
              lol Crawford is not Lacy, and you certainly not Calzaghe

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Griever0730 View Post
                Why does everytime one of the Brits fights an American, they always compare it to Lacy-Calzaghe? None of those Brits compared have ever been anywhere as good as Calzaghe and none of the Americans compared have ever been near as bad and overrated as Lacy. They needa let that nonsense go. It's like it's hung onto for some sense of superiority over Americans. That ish lame af. Like both guys, but Crawford gonna do a job on Brook. Simple as that.
                ———

                Ha ha ha!!! Not just that. Most Brits believe that Calzaghe reached the zenith of boxing by beating Roy Jones - a long decrepit shadow of his old self. Mits the same reason they value Khan’s win over Zab.
                To the Brits, conquering the US is always a big deal.

                That said, I’m rooting for Brook to upset Crawford. Not because I like him but just because Crawford has turned into a cherry picking version of PAC

                A shocking loss will pretty much end his career. Even if he were to win the rematch. There is no justification of any kind at 33 years of age for Crawford’s resume to look as tattered as it does.

                Comment


                • #38
                  I guess he could have referenced Wilder vs Fury. Lacey and Wilder were both unskilled hype job fighters with a punch and no record exposed by a more skilled fighter, does that help ?

                  I don't think obviously there is any comparison in Brook Crawford. I'd be surprised if you can find even "a Brit" fan who makes Brook favourite or anywhere close to even in this fight.

                  Originally posted by Griever0730 View Post
                  Why does everytime one of the Brits fights an American, they always compare it to Lacy-Calzaghe? None of those Brits compared have ever been anywhere as good as Calzaghe and none of the Americans compared have ever been near as bad and overrated as Lacy. They needa let that nonsense go. It's like it's hung onto for some sense of superiority over Americans. That ish lame af. Like both guys, but Crawford gonna do a job on Brook. Simple as that.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I wish I could find someone to bet on this fight. I've been looking high and low.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Stuntman Mike View Post
                      Hopkins was robbed its punches that score not wrist slaps

                      Hopkins made him look amateurish

                      Calzaghes best and only relevant win is a prime kessler and is he really that great to begin with
                      Kessler was seen as his top challenger at the time and Calzaghe beat him clean. That's really all you can ask for from the consensus #1 guy, to beat the consensus #2 guy decisively.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP