If Bud had not been so loyal to TopRank and Bog and resigned with them, he would have definitely fought some of these guys by now. Bog likes to milk guys and has hated Al Haymon for allowing fighters to get there worth. In turn Bog doesn't want to do business and it hurts the big fights, and bogs these guys careers down.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford's Wish List: Pacquiao Would Be No. 1; Spence Right After That; Garcia, Thurman
Collapse
-
Originally posted by hitmanjosh View PostCrawford ain’t never been afraid of any of these guys but the way boxing is based on networks and promotions some things haven’t worked out. He’s no different than Pacquiao when it comes to being willing to face whomever, but it still has to make sense because everyone want to get paid! He ain’t never scared though. Bob is and will always be greedy so his age doesn’t matter, he still like things on his terms. Crawford loyalty more than likely cost him him the biggest fights that could be made when he resigned with Bob Arum, it’s that simple.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostLike I've been saying for months, all eyes on Pacquiao! Some Spence haters try to pretend Crawford does not want Pacquiao, only Spence! Well now that bogus argument has vanished! No.1 on Crawford's list, just like Spence, is Manny Pacquaio!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joeboxeo View PostCrawford want to fight Pac since Manny was on top with Top Rank...It's a long time now
July 24, 2016:
Terence Crawford: Manny Pacquiao Must Fight Me at 140!
Crawford has no problem with facing Pacquiao but cautions that - "It will be at 140."
"If Bob Arum wants that fight and my coaches want that fight, that's something we'll talk about later. I let my coaches handle that. I am a fighter and I will fight anybody. I'm happy and I'm about to go on vacation. We not worried about Manny Pacquiao right now."
https://www.boxingscene.com/terence-...me-140--107021
He should've been worried, and he shouldn't have made any demands either, even if Roach did say Pac could make 140! Could've been a legacy-defining fight? Hindsight is 20/20!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Get em up View PostThey both want Pac first because money over legacy comes into play and that lottery ticket affords either guy a huge money fight with Pac before they fight each other and lose the 0 that is providing either guy beats Pac. Odds are in their favor against Pac but he has beat the odds before
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dallas' 4 Eva View PostI wonder if people will give Crawford hell for saying Pac is always a first priority over Spence, like they did Spence when he said Pac was a first priority over Crawford? Probably not on this biased message board.
This drama has to end already
Comment
-
I will just say that Pacquiao is 41 and even thou he still a great fighter he is not anywhere near the monster he was.
Crawford chasing Pacquiao over Spence tells me everything I need to know about him, he a terrific fighter but I got a lot more respect for Errol than for him.
And no, it's impossible for me tu put him #1 P4P, the guy hasn't done anything in the last 3 years.
Comment
-
Comment