Originally posted by Bronx2245
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford's Wish List: Pacquiao Would Be No. 1; Spence Right After That; Garcia, Thurman
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by batista84 View PostI will just say that Pacquiao is 41 and even thou he still a great fighter he is not anywhere near the monster he was.
Crawford chasing Pacquiao over Spence tells me everything I need to know about him, he a terrific fighter but I got a lot more respect for Errol than for him.
And no, it's impossible for me tu put him #1 P4P, the guy hasn't done anything in the last 3 years.
Spence said the same thing when Custer asked him, he said he wants to fight Danny, Pacquaio, and then Terence Crawford.
If you have no respect for Crawford because of what he said, then you should have no respect for Spence either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillaMane26 View PostBut at the same time.. Top Rank had a stable of guys for Manny to fight. And as soon as they ran out, look who Manny was fighting? A bunch of nobodies who had no business in the ring with him. Only reason he getting good fights now is cuz he left.
But I don't like the excuses Crawford make about fighting the guys like Porter who would sign in a heartbeat. Also don't like how they didn't try to negotiate with Thurman ran to twitter instead of trying to work out a deal.
His contract almost up .. if he resigns, I don't want to hear any excuses
Literally just two weeks before that controversy Thurman said he would but Crawford aint never sent a contract to him.
Then the interviewer asked him: "So are you saying if Crawford sent you a contract right now, you would sign the contract and fight him next?"
Thurman immediately realised what he said and backtracked immediately, talked about he would need a tune up first and went around in circles like he usually does.
Then two weeks later he pulls this ten million stunt.
**** outta here!
Thurman aint **** and he fo damn sure doesn't want that smoke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doubledagger View PostYou're not fooling anyone. We know the real reason you want that to happen, its cause your fragile mind won't be able to take seeing Pac laid out unconscious again like he did when Marquez KHTFO
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostI'm a die-hard Mayweather fan, in case you don't know! That being said, I do NOT want to see Pacquiao laid out unconscious at 42 YEARS OLD! I did NOT like seeing Holmes beating up on Ali, when Ali was 38 YEARS OLD! I also didn't like seeing Bernard Hopkins knocked out the ring by Joe Smith Jr., when B-Hop was 51 YEARS OLD! If you do, then you have issues!
What the **** kind of boxing fan advocates for someone to hold a division hostage?
Why don't you advocate for Pac to drop the belt then so that the division can move on?
Instead you're out here cheering him on for cherry picking like a fangirl and holding the belt and the division hostage.
You're a fake boxing fan man.
I'm a die hard Mayweather fan too, and I would never support this shieet even if it was him doing it.
You know I actually routed for Pac to beat Thurman because I thought Thurman would hold up the division if he won and refuse to fight the other top guys like Spence and Crawford.
I was actually glad Manny won because I thought he would do the right thing.
Instead we get this shieet, probably even worse than what Thurman would be doing right now, smh.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Doubledagger View PostNah fam you have issues.
What the **** kind of boxing fan advocates for someone to hold a division hostage?
Why don't you advocate for Pac to drop the belt then so that the division can move on?
Instead you're out here cheering him on for cherry picking like a fangirl and holding the belt and the division hostage.
You're a fake boxing fan man.
I'm a die hard Mayweather fan too, and I would never support this shieet even if it was him doing it.
You know I actually routed for Pac to beat Thurman because I thought Thurman would hold up the division if he won and refuse to fight the other top guys like Spence and Crawford.
I was actually glad Manny won because I thought he would do the right thing.
Instead we get this shieet, probably even worse than what Thurman would be doing right now, smh.
So you're making only Pac accountable for holding the division but not Spence or Crawford? Look at this LMAO
Why TF do you care if Pac vacates the belt or not? Ugas has the other belt. Spence and Crawford can go unify with Ugas and still becomes the undisputed as soon as Pac vacates and retires, or he may decide to fight the one who comes out on top.
He's a Mayweather fan I can respect. You're someone I can't. Just an obsessed hater who still fixates the JMM KO replay who I'm sure you're not a fan of.
Lemme guess - Pac beat Thurman
Therefore, gonna hate Pac and Thurman
Comment
-
I'm surprised he has Thurman and Danny Garcia on his list but not Mikey Garcia.
Mikey Garcia said he lost to Crawford in the amateurs because the headgear protected Crawford from his power. If Mikey wants a shot at a 147 belt, challenge Crawford.
Comment
-
The fact that an old man is first on his list does not bother him at all, and tells you all you need to know about this loser.
Comment
-
Comment