———————-
I copied that part to so I could say the exact thing you said.
Crawford is 32 or 33 and has literally fought nobody at WW.
Porter has a better resume despite losses in great fights. Even Thurman who is considered the weakest WW has a better resume.
Floyd, despite being criticized by some had a much better resume at 32/33 than Crawford. How Crawford is ranked #1 is amusing to say the least.
I copied that part to so I could say the exact thing you said.
Crawford is 32 or 33 and has literally fought nobody at WW.
Porter has a better resume despite losses in great fights. Even Thurman who is considered the weakest WW has a better resume.
Floyd, despite being criticized by some had a much better resume at 32/33 than Crawford. How Crawford is ranked #1 is amusing to say the least.
Comment