[QUOTE=thack;20872449]
So Spence won't fight Crawford .. Eddie Hearns fault .. there is a flaw in your logic.
Rematches are annoying but I would suggest it makes it more likely Spence and Crawford would fight with a rematch clause.
What you want is fighters fighting each other so much and no one caring about losses that rematch clauses become redundant. If for example you removed the rematch clause from Whyte vs Povetkin the effect would be Whyte doesn't fight Povetkin and would fight say Flores which Ortiz took. Helenius vs Knowacki is another example (in that case Helenius had to agree to another PBC fight of Al s choosing). Arums just as bad by the way, Lomachecko had one no rematch clause fight because Top Rank owned both fighters.

Rematches are annoying but I would suggest it makes it more likely Spence and Crawford would fight with a rematch clause.
What you want is fighters fighting each other so much and no one caring about losses that rematch clauses become redundant. If for example you removed the rematch clause from Whyte vs Povetkin the effect would be Whyte doesn't fight Povetkin and would fight say Flores which Ortiz took. Helenius vs Knowacki is another example (in that case Helenius had to agree to another PBC fight of Al s choosing). Arums just as bad by the way, Lomachecko had one no rematch clause fight because Top Rank owned both fighters.
Comment