Comments Thread For: Whyte Doubts Wilder Will Fight Again: He's a Coward and a Disgrace!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxingfanatic75
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2018
    • 5300
    • 1,915
    • 714
    • 54,883

    #51
    Originally posted by Sweden2716
    Boxingfanatic75 you cannot just say anything, that is why Mayweather had to pay off Pacman about false claims about doping, spiking water in a fight is a crime, i.e leads to potential lawsuit
    He paid him off to make him go away as it’d been cheaper to just pay him off than a long court battle. Trust me Breland would not have a case and it’d get tossed. He is a public figure. Go look up the laws .

    Comment

    • landotter
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2017
      • 4050
      • 1,334
      • 5,716
      • 33,265

      #52
      Self destruction. It is painful to watch. But it is good theater.

      Wilder will fight. Middle of next year. It will be a return to greatness in his mind and in the words of the yes men and women in his life who will enable him and live off his success. He will flatten some limited fighter and will look off balance and ugly. After that who knows? We all know someone who deflects, accuses, lives in a world that is isolated and will reacts emotionally to every setback and problem. Wilder is that guy. It is sad. A little honest self evaluation, and brining in some real trainers would make a HUGE difference in the back half of his career. Maybe it is too late to change him, but just the basics would improve him to a great degree. He has magical power. He is athletic. He does have tools. But he is self absorbed, immature, and lives in a world where everyone agrees with him or he cuts them out. Since he has money, he can.

      Self destruction. It is an ugly thing.

      Comment

      • landotter
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2017
        • 4050
        • 1,334
        • 5,716
        • 33,265

        #53
        Originally posted by Real King Kong
        Many o cousins were fawked that night.
        Make fun if you will, but that old dude has some MOVES.

        Comment

        • Real King Kong
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 12017
          • 454
          • 24
          • 105,905

          #54
          Originally posted by landotter
          Make fun if you will, but that old dude has some MOVES.
          He has better footwork than wilder, that’s for sure.

          Comment

          • Laligalaliga
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2018
            • 6439
            • 71
            • 11
            • 90,109

            #55
            Wilder was actually chasing may weather's record and fury derailed it. Its not easy to swallow for a 5 yo champ but he should man up and move on.

            Comment

            • Laligalaliga
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2018
              • 6439
              • 71
              • 11
              • 90,109

              #56
              Originally posted by The Big Dunn
              Whyte is a bum. His greatest win is wilder not fighting him.
              Wilder running away from real competition got him into fury's trouble. He never saw that coming. No sympathy for the man.

              Comment

              • Laligalaliga
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2018
                • 6439
                • 71
                • 11
                • 90,109

                #57
                Originally posted by pollywog
                Says the guy too scared to fight Parker again after the dodgy juiced up win he was gifted.

                Jog on Dillian...
                Are you afraid of him fighting wilder?

                Comment

                • Zelda
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2019
                  • 2072
                  • 393
                  • 73
                  • 19,172

                  #58
                  Wilder may have his problems but Whyte should be the last person to comment on it. Why does Whyte still have a Wilder obsession? He got ignored by Fury as well, was too scared to fight Joshua again, and got knocked out badly by Povetkin.

                  Comment

                  • andocom
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 1115
                    • 145
                    • 64
                    • 20,088

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75
                    No, Jerry Falwell made a living as a television pastor and such a claim if believed could have had substantial ramifications for him. Much larger than Breland. We are talking millions not hundred of thousands. Trust me this would go nowhere at all. Breland is a public figure.
                    Jesus, if you are going to start citing cases of precedent, at least have a basic understanding of what precedent was involved. Hustler vs Falwell is used as precedent of satire and parody being protected speech, the only relevance of being a public figure is to support the parody, i.e. it is pretty hard to parody an unknown person.

                    Unless you think Wilder's claim is an actual joke, as in not meant or likely to be interpreted as factual by a reasonable person (this is the precedent) Hustler vs Falwell is completely irrelevant.

                    Obviously Wilder's claims weren't satire or parody and very likely libellous.

                    If you don't know case law don't cite it and pretend you do, or at least look it up before you do, it would have taken 2 minutes to see you were completely wrong.

                    Comment

                    • Ray*
                      Be safe!!!
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 44867
                      • 1,654
                      • 1,608
                      • 558,890

                      #60
                      Originally posted by andocom
                      Jesus, if you are going to start citing cases of precedent, at least have a basic understanding of what precedent was involved. Hustler vs Falwell is used as precedent of satire and parody being protected speech, the only relevance of being a public figure is to support the parody, i.e. it is pretty hard to parody an unknown person.

                      Unless you think Wilder's claim is an actual joke, as in not meant or likely to be interpreted as factual by a reasonable person (this is the precedent) Hustler vs Falwell is completely irrelevant.

                      Obviously Wilder's claims weren't satire or parody and very likely libellous.

                      If you don't know case law don't cite it and pretend you do, or at least look it up before you do, it would have taken 2 minutes to see you were completely wrong.
                      Yeah am surprised anyone would think Breland doesn’t have a case, but anyhow. Breland is too loyal to sue. I hope he does, not only him but both refs from the first and second fights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP