“Loma was too small”
Collapse
-
I've never heard anyone here term it as such but even at these weights,fighters cutting all hell to just make the weight and hydrating 15lbs+ is a huge difference to a fighter hardly cutting and adding a few lbs....I'm not here to make excuses for loma,exceptional boxer,but theres a reason fighters do it and clearly it's to have a size/strength advantage,why else would they?Comment
-
It's nothing new. I see a bigger size difference between fighters at 154 all the time. Hell, look at Makabu compared to the rest of the cruiserweights.I've never heard anyone here term it as such but even at these weights,fighters cutting all hell to just make the weight and hydrating 15lbs+ is a huge difference to a fighter hardly cutting and adding a few lbs....I'm not here to make excuses for loma,exceptional boxer,but theres a reason fighters do it and clearly it's to have a size/strength advantage,why else would they?Comment
-
Comment
-
Loma never looked like the next level dynamo at lightweight like he was hyped to be, but it's arguably his most accomplished division - it's the only division in which he's unified. He lost to Salido at featherweight and didn't rematch him when he moved up to super featherweight and that was the most meaningful fight to be made, nor did he face Berchelt when that was arguably the most dangerous and stylistically compelling fight to be made. Defeating Lopez was supposed to be the fight that cemented his legacy.Comment
-
Why cant people say loma was too small? People did it immediately for Rigo after the loma fight. LOL.Comment
-
Comment
Comment