Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How did Top Rank and Lomachenko fool so many of you?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Fanofreason View Post
    Loma lost has debut and went life and death with Gary Russell. Zero greatness there. A solid A- to B+ fighter but not special
    I always had Loma at B+, now he's B-. B+ is the greatest in boxing now. There are no greats (A or A-) in all of boxing now. Some with a good potential. If pushed, I might give Estrada an A-.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
      Dude is clearly a low IQ clown. A real moron with 0 boxing knowledge. Just your typical dumbass bunboy. Cognitive dissonance is rampant with dumbasses like him.
      Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
      Salidoe


      Sonned


      Your boy


      In the pros
      Lol the irony and projection here is astounding. I guarantee that I am way way way smarter than you. And I also know that I am way more successful than you too. I can tell both of those things by the way you speak about other men, great men who fight for a living and put their bodies on the line for our entertainment.

      What kind of man, and objective boxing analyst, refers to guys as 'Bumchenko, lil G, Beyonce Wilder, Pacr.oid, Ga.yweather, CoWard' etc. You're a loser man, and you expose yourself with every post. So keep going, please, I love it.

      Scroll through all my posts if you can find the ability to do so. You will never see me talk about fighters I dislike or don't think highly of, like that. You litter those comments in every one of your posts.

      You're far too emotional to try and make it out that you're a real boxing analyst. Truth be told, you're like a woman or young child. Too emotional and not detached and logical with your analysis.

      Then you talk about me and don't have the stones as a man to quote me. What a loser lol.

      What weight class would you be in btw bro? I want to picture what some of you losers look like when I'm talking to you lol

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
        Salidoe


        Sonned


        Your boy


        In the pros

        Sonned=Lowblowed

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View Post
          The bold: Bro, leave this part from all your 'final' convos, from now on. Some of your comments might still stand by themselves without that. We don't care what anybody looks like or does in real life.
          Believe it or not, I'm trying to help people like that.

          Maybe people should work on their self-esteem in real life, and need to have that mentioned to them. If they did that and actually liked themselves more, they wouldn't be so negative and disgusting on here. And would be more fans of the sport, instead of fans of certain guys.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post
            Believe it or not, I'm trying to help people like that.

            Maybe people should work on their self-esteem in real life, and need to have that mentioned to them. If they did that and actually liked themselves more, they wouldn't be so negative and disgusting on here. And would be more fans of the sport, instead of fans of certain guys.
            Most good fans of boxing are also fighter fans. It's impossible to be a fan without having favorite fighters. I ignore people who try to front and seem neutral. Those are the worst ones.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View Post
              Most good fans of boxing are also fighter fans. It's impossible to be a fan without having favorite fighters. I ignore people who try to front and seem neutral. Those are the worst ones.
              Well we all have our biases, that is true. But you can tell who is neutral imo in how they score fights. Some score, every time, in the way of their guys, as wide as possible, or against the other guys, as wide as possible. They expose themselves all the time.

              I have guys I am a fan of, but it isn't dependent on race. Race helps to relate to some guys, this is true. But for me it is about the overall style as far as who I am a fan of.

              And when 2 guys step in the ring, I have too much respect for both guys to call it any other way than neutral. Let the best man win.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
                Elite Heavyweight in this era for sure. But that's not saying much. Windmill Wakanda Wilder is a top Heavyweight. Glass jaw AJ who gets beat by short fat Mexicans is a top Heavyweight. Charles Martin held a Heavyweight belt in this era . Andy Ruiz held multiple straps not long ago .
                Aw can't compete intellectually so has to send red K poor thing

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post
                  Believe it or not, I'm trying to help people like that.

                  Maybe people should work on their self-esteem in real life, and need to have that mentioned to them. If they did that and actually liked themselves more, they wouldn't be so negative and disgusting on here. And would be more fans of the sport, instead of fans of certain guys.

                  Uh your butthurt enough about people on a forum critiquing random boxers(who all have something in common though you already admitted thats the reason) that I have replied once and left multiple times and every time I come back youre still here, having replied to like 30 new posts, you have not left, and you have replied to my single post twice now like three times in a row, they bother you that much.


                  Uhh, you literally just admitting you d**kride eastern euros.
                  What a coincidence you like them and
                  *gasp*
                  Have never had them losing to a non eastern euro, they have only lost by robbery and/or corruption.

                  Its almost like
                  *gasp*
                  Youre f**cling biased as hell!

                  Lets just scrap and shoot all the judges, who needs them, not like their cards matter.
                  We’ll just wait until you log in after the fights and tell us plebeians what actually went down.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by glenn mcrory View Post
                    Uh your butthurt enough about people on a forum critiquing random boxers(who all have something in common though you already admitted thats the reason) that I have replied once and left multiple times and every time I come back youre still here, having replied to like 30 new posts, you have not left, and you have replied to my single post twice now like three times in a row, they bother you that much.


                    Uhh, you literally just admitting you d**kride eastern euros.
                    What a coincidence you like them and
                    *gasp*
                    Have never had them losing to a non eastern euro, they have only lost by robbery and/or corruption.

                    Its almost like
                    *gasp*
                    Youre f**cling biased as hell!

                    Lets just scrap and shoot all the judges, who needs them, not like their cards matter.
                    We’ll just wait until you log in after the fights and tell us plebeians what actually went down.
                    I had Loma even with Linares before the KO. Campbell won 4 or 5 rounds. Kov clearly beat Ward. Canelo fought well enough in both fights vs GGG, but he wasn't in enough rounds to win 6 in either fight. Same with Jacobs except he would have had to have won 7.

                    I had Loma losing last night as well. I thought Chilemba did better vs Kovalev than Ward did btw. I have no biases when I score fights.

                    The three guys mentioned - Kov, Loma and GGG were all top 10 pfp over the last 5 years. To do that, you have to have almost all good performances and wins.

                    Loma has no controversial opinion in his fights. I have his fights vs Linares and Campbell as close as anyone. As we saw with the Lopez fight, I think I had those fights read well. Some say Loma 'dominated' those fights but he obviously didn't. They were tough close fights. It isn't really that hard to tell when a fight is a tough fight. You know what those look like.

                    If GGG wasn't so polarizing I think everyone would acknowledge his only close fight was vs Sergei. I just don't see how anyone gets to 6 or more rounds for Canelo and Danny. They aren't there.

                    Kovalev only has 1 real debatable fight. Everyone knows he won vs Ward the first time. It was basically the same type of performance as Lopez last night vs Loma. 2nd fight with Ward was controversial. Literally ended on a low blow(s). It is what it is but that fight is controversial and saying that is not some racist opinion.

                    I have never been super high on Usyk, compared to everyone else. I thought his fight with Hunter was very close. As mentioned I felt Fury drew with Wilder in fight 1 as well.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post
                      I had Loma even with Linares before the KO. Campbell won 4 or 5 rounds. Kov clearly beat Ward. Canelo fought well enough in both fights vs GGG, but he wasn't in enough rounds to win 6 in either fight. Same with Jacobs except he would have had to have won 7.

                      I had Loma losing last night as well. I thought Chilemba did better vs Kovalev than Ward did btw. I have no biases when I score fights.

                      The three guys mentioned - Kov, Loma and GGG were all top 10 pfp over the last 5 years. To do that, you have to have almost all good performances and wins.

                      Loma has no controversial opinion in his fights. I have his fights vs Linares and Campbell as close as anyone. As we saw with the Lopez fight, I think I had those fights read well. Some say Loma 'dominated' those fights but he obviously didn't. They were tough close fights. It isn't really that hard to tell when a fight is a tough fight. You know what those look like.

                      If GGG wasn't so polarizing I think everyone would acknowledge his only close fight was vs Sergei. I just don't see how anyone gets to 6 or more rounds for Canelo and Danny. They aren't there.

                      Kovalev only has 1 real debatable fight. Everyone knows he won vs Ward the first time. It was basically the same type of performance as Lopez last night vs Loma. 2nd fight with Ward was controversial. Literally ended on a low blow(s). It is what it is but that fight is controversial and saying that is not some racist opinion.

                      I have never been super high on Usyk, compared to everyone else. I thought his fight with Hunter was very close. As mentioned I felt Fury drew with Wilder in fight 1 as well.
                      Everything just reads to me luke every debatable win for them ends on some giant labyrinthine tower of justification for why yet again, it was not enough.

                      Yes the Alvarez and Jacobs fights can be losses for Golovkin, you saying they dont doesn't mean anything.

                      Linares had a knockdown, he shouldve been up, you had it even with the knockdown.
                      I had Kovalev schooling Ward the first time but Kovalev legitimately got nuked by a head punch in the second fight, he was literally never recovering regardless of low blows so that was a ko loss to me.

                      Of course you had Lomachenko losing to Lopez, only the actual asylum patients had him winning. Youre not there yet, but youre on your way so log off for a while and cool off.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP