do you consider that a "duck" or not?
Do you consider Deontay Wilder letting his rematch clause expire a duck?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
How do you duck someone you already fought twice
Wilder didn’t win neither and lost badly the 2nd time
Not a duck if Wilder decides to fight
Someone elseLast edited by GrandpaBernard; 10-15-2020, 05:27 PM. -
Wilder rematched Fury ASAP following a close first fight
I’m no Wilder fan but quickly rematching a tough opponent is ballsComment
-
It’s a way of ducking it without saying it
I think the fact he hasn’t even come out and said he wants to fight tells us everything we need to know
I’m not going to slate him too much. 35 and made some excellent money in the past a few years. He might just wonder what’s the point in going back in with someone he can’t beat and someone who annihilated him last time. If people want to make good money and get out safely then ideally now would be the time really, Unless he thinks he can beat Fury, which I think he knows he can’t.Comment
-
Anyone remember that cat who used to wear a custom sig with the duck dynasty family replaced with the Mayweathers?
That sig was funny AF.
Its what I picture in my mind every time I see a thread like this.
Was he one of the many posse members that vanished after Manny lost his soul to Floyd?Comment
-
-
No. I mean you can make the argument since there was a rematch clause, but Fury outboxed Wilder the 1st fight and out fought him the next 2nd time.
If Fury actually had something to prove or gain from beating Wilder again like a title and a chance to unify, then I'd say it's a duck. But that's clearly not the case now.
So it's not like Wilder is preventing Fury from enhancing his legacy and they fought twice already. He's moving on now, and so is Fury. Nothing wrong with that.Comment
Comment