Comments Thread For: Rigondeaux Backs Lomachenko To Beat Teofimo Lopez, Explains Why
Collapse
-
Under the belt work is not body work. It was counted 49 times that he landed under the belt and came in 4 divisions bigger. If you personally dislike someone, sure you probably dont care and enjoy watching fails and bad judgement just to laugh at someone. I wouldnt be surprised if you enjoy our president's arrogance too.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't size was the only factor in that win and there's no excuse for him quitting, but there was clearly a significant size difference between the 2. Loma looked legitimately at least 2 weight classes bigger than Rigo.Comment
-
Under the belt work is not body work. It was counted 49 times that he landed under the belt and came in 4 divisions bigger. If you personally dislike someone, sure you probably dont care and enjoy watching fails and bad judgement just to laugh at someone. I wouldnt be surprised if you enjoy our president's arrogance too.Comment
-
I don't agree with Rigo's take on the fight.
But this is what I've been saying to Loma fanboys who insist we should count the Rigo win. It was a farce of a weight mismatch:
"I don't land on that Lomachenko list [of top fighters he's beaten], because I'm actually an 118-pounder and he was a 130-pounder," Rigondeaux added.Comment
-
If not, get your head checked. Lawrence Cole is one of the worst refs in pro boxing history. The guy is a grade A moron.Comment
-
I don't agree with Rigo's take on the fight.
But this is what I've been saying to Loma fanboys who insist we should count the Rigo win. It was a farce of a weight mismatch:
"I don't land on that Lomachenko list [of top fighters he's beaten], because I'm actually an 118-pounder and he was a 130-pounder," Rigondeaux added.
You don't agree with a guy who fought Loma and sparred Teofimo?
What do you bring to the argument other than your opinion?Comment
Comment