Comments Thread For: Lomachenko's Weekend Dominance Will Leave a Historic Impression
Collapse
-
-
That’s a real ****** listTyson Fury, Canelo, Crawford, Golovkin, Bieterbiev, Gervonta Davis, Lopez, Spence, Usyk, Wilder (not technically, Obviously) Joshua, probably a few more but I can't be bothered to look it up. I'll change my mind if he beats Lopez and put him into the top 5.
I've got £300 on Lopez winning at 3-1, so I have some confidence in it happening. I think Linares showed weaknesses in Loma's game, they were neck and and neck for skill, and Linares is only a moderate puncher and he completely flattened Loma.Comment
-
Agree 100% Nailed it!Overhyped because hes not as great as people make him out to be. Hes a very good fighter and a great talent but I digress.
In near all of his toughest fights he's never truly been able to win convincingly despite all the skills he showcases.
Compare to guys I would consider higher p4p Lomachenko/Inoue.
Both these guys are head and shoulders above the guys they've previously fought and dont need shady score cards to make their fights competitive.
For example does Canelo get KOs or win wide decisions against top talent in his weight classes? Is he fighting the best available guys?
The answer to both of those are no.
Canelo has a very good resume but just like Floyd its more hype than truth.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Put your future, where your mouth is Lyle!
Lopez Señior is so confident his son will beat Lomachenko that he said if his son loses, he will stop coaching. So my question is for the writer of this article "Lyle Fitzsimmons," if your prediction to this fight doesn't become reality, WILL YOU STOP WRITING!! Lyle, you made some bold statements behind your keyboard without facts, only opinions; you will be humiliated as Loma, for being so ignorant!Comment
-
—————Overhyped because hes not as great as people make him out to be. Hes a very good fighter and a great talent but I digress.
In near all of his toughest fights he's never truly been able to win convincingly despite all the skills he showcases.
Compare to guys I would consider higher p4p Lomachenko/Inoue.
Both these guys are head and shoulders above the guys they've previously fought and dont need shady score cards to make their fights competitive.
For example does Canelo get KOs or win wide decisions against top talent in his weight classes? Is he fighting the best available guys?
The answer to both of those are no.
Canelo has a very good resume but just like Floyd its more hype than truth.
I was reluctantly agreeing with you but you make the same points I typically make about Canelo (he struggles against good boxers and it seems he’s set on carefully selecting who he fights despite the obvious skills he clearly has.
But then you compared him to Floyd. No need to get into the merits or de-merits of Floyd. There is just no comparison at all between the two.
I still think that Canelo can be an ATG right if he unified the 168Ibs division. He’s still young and can fight at least 10 more times. I’ll wait before I call him a hype jobComment
-
Thanks for displaying your ignorance. He wasn't the best boxer in the world when he fought Salido and Hopkins wasn't a record-setting champion when he lost his first fight and ATG Alexis Arguello wasn't an ATG when he lost his 4th and 5th pro fight. And few fighters have even fought a champion or former world champion in their second fight. Now laugh your a$$ off on how little you know about boxing - that is something to laugh at.Comment
Comment