If Lomachenko loses.

[ELPacman]

In boxing and especially on this forum, you are only as good as your last fight. If Loma loses, everyone will call him overhyped, overrated and a bum now.

It goes from calling him a style we've never seen before in boxing to a bum. Only in boxing.

Loma's already proven. His accomplishments are set. If he lost to Lopez, before I call him already spent or done, I would like to see him in 1 more match after and then gauge how much he has left. Too many write off someone off their last loss. They should get a follow-up fight before you can truly assess how much they have left.

[MUNG]

if he loses he loses, it's not like he is protecting his 0, which is top priority for a lot of guys & u don't have to look far to see who!!

i hope that if teo does pull it out somehow that he get's the decision if it does go that far, i presume that loma is the a-side in this one

[chaosisme]

What about the post just above that. They guy joined in April 2013. I suspect it was April 1st, also the worst year in boxing history for absorbing boxing "knowledge". When a guy sees things than absolutely no one else in the world saw, in a fight, One wonders.

Which reminds me of the very old song. beginning........
"Oh I wonder yes I wonder, do the angels way up yonder, do the angels play their harps all day".

Being purely musicians, they didn't know anything about boxing either.

Yes. I made this account in 2013, but I've been posting here for about 13 years. I used to post at the 13th round.com but there wasn't much activity there, and before that I was on the ESPN forums.

Just because you don't like the way I troll (is there really any point in having a serious discussion here, now?), it doesn't mean I haven't been following the sport for awhile.

[edgarg]

Yes. I made this account in 2013, but I've been posting here for about 13 years. I used to post at the 13th round.com but there wasn't much activity there, and before that I was on the ESPN forums.

Just because you don't like the way I troll (is there really any point in having a serious discussion here, now?), it doesn't mean I haven't been following the sport for awhile.

Apologies, was using "literary licence" because it sounded good, even if, from your post, which I accept, it was not exactly a fact. I prefer to exchange in mutual discussions ,not wars, as life is too short for all that stuff.

The April thing was just too good not to use, but as you know I could have no real idea as to the actual day you signed on. .