Listen, you are entitled to your opinion. But we need to be clear with the facts of the matter.
The problem with that analogy is that Barkley didn't beat the best version of Hearns.
Remember, Hearns for some ****** reason fought at light middle, then middle while still campaigning at light middle, then light heavy (in the process damn near getting taken the full distance by a British journeyman) while still campaigning at middle, then super middle.
All that up and down weight gain and drain is damaging to the body. That was the period that effectively ruined Hearns. He would never be the same fighter and lost significant durability. Actually, he fought at middleweight the exact same way that Crawford fights now - chin up in the air, takes punches, and just tries to put on a show. And like Crawford, Hearns got wobbled almost every fight against someone above the C-level.
Iran swooped in and stopped a version of Hearns that was nowhere near at peak. I don't hate on him for the opportunistic timing. The only reason people were shocked is that Iran was prospect-level at that time; no notable win whatsoever outside of MAYBE Robbie Sims and the one time he did step up before Hearns, he got blown out as expected (Kalambay), thus the odds expected Hearns to make short work of this guy.
But Hearns was affected by significant weight fluctuation and had less punch resistance as a result. Same thing that affected Roy Jones when he did it.
Srisaket beat the BEST version of Chocolatito twice, on Choco's terms as A-Side. He beat the guy that Floyd Mayweather once referred to as #1 P4P. And he did with ease both times.
I know there are some people that somehow think Choco won the first fight but once again - if you get DROPPED in a close fight, you cannot win it, otherwise we need to say that Keef beat Manny.
It's just that people are disregarding Srisaket's performance because of the accidental headbutts. Choco got walked down like I've never seen him or anyone else get walked down besides McGregor.
The problem with that analogy is that Barkley didn't beat the best version of Hearns.
Remember, Hearns for some ****** reason fought at light middle, then middle while still campaigning at light middle, then light heavy (in the process damn near getting taken the full distance by a British journeyman) while still campaigning at middle, then super middle.
All that up and down weight gain and drain is damaging to the body. That was the period that effectively ruined Hearns. He would never be the same fighter and lost significant durability. Actually, he fought at middleweight the exact same way that Crawford fights now - chin up in the air, takes punches, and just tries to put on a show. And like Crawford, Hearns got wobbled almost every fight against someone above the C-level.
Iran swooped in and stopped a version of Hearns that was nowhere near at peak. I don't hate on him for the opportunistic timing. The only reason people were shocked is that Iran was prospect-level at that time; no notable win whatsoever outside of MAYBE Robbie Sims and the one time he did step up before Hearns, he got blown out as expected (Kalambay), thus the odds expected Hearns to make short work of this guy.
But Hearns was affected by significant weight fluctuation and had less punch resistance as a result. Same thing that affected Roy Jones when he did it.
Srisaket beat the BEST version of Chocolatito twice, on Choco's terms as A-Side. He beat the guy that Floyd Mayweather once referred to as #1 P4P. And he did with ease both times.
I know there are some people that somehow think Choco won the first fight but once again - if you get DROPPED in a close fight, you cannot win it, otherwise we need to say that Keef beat Manny.
It's just that people are disregarding Srisaket's performance because of the accidental headbutts. Choco got walked down like I've never seen him or anyone else get walked down besides McGregor.
Comment