Originally posted by moochi
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Yildirim WBC Purse Bid Postponed To October 6
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by kafkod View Post
How you like these apples!?
BJS vs Andrade = 3 years going
BJS vs GGG = 5 years going
BJS vs Canelo = 4 years going
BJS vs Smith = 2 years going
BJS vs Blah blah = etc
Fury vs Joshua = 3 years going
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View PostIt's funny to hear Canelo fans defend this attempt to take the cheap route to a title and act like he didn't know it'd be Yidilgrim he'd have to face. Canelo never once mentioned facing benavidez when he was wbc champ, but the second that belt was vacant, he jumped on it knowing he'd be asked to face their #1 contender, who happened to be a guy that was wiped out by Eubank Jr. Canelo fans hate to admit the truth because they've spent yrs saying mayweather minimized risk, only to watch canelo minimize risk for the better part of the last 6 yrs by facing mostly 35 and over competition, C level opponents and implement catchweights /rehydration clauses.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Robi13 View PostYet canelo has the second best resume in all of boxing behind paquiao... shut your hating ass up
Lara,Trout, GGG, Jacobs the only real good wins. And we can add Kov.
The rest were washed up guys with names fights undermined from astericks.
Then take into account he arguably lost to Lara and GGG.
Comment
-
"The case was conditionally rejected though with room for an amended filing with a September 28 deadline."
This is what I am most interested in. I could not care less about any purse bid date or whatever.
What is the current status of the law suit and how is it going to affect everything moving forward?
Also, this fight is a step above the Canelo V Rocky fight...........It should be a December fight and not a normal Canelo scheduled date.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillaMane26 View PostBut his record is overrated.
Lara,Trout, GGG, Jacobs the only real good wins. And we can add Kov.
The rest were washed up guys with names fights undermined from astericks.
Then take into account he arguably lost to Lara and GGG.
I try not to look at a record. I try to focus my attention on the quality of the fight and what the quality of the journey was.
What looks better, 62-7 or 59-10?
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillaMane26 View PostBut his record is overrated.
Lara,Trout, GGG, Jacobs the only real good wins. And we can add Kov.
The rest were washed up guys with names fights undermined from astericks.
Then take into account he arguably lost to Lara and GGG.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Silver Spear View PostI believe he said "resume" not "record". You can have a great resume and a not so great record. Look at Pac, great resume, not a great record, good but not great. Whether Canelo lost to Lara or Ggg is irrelevant when talking about his resume. He fought them both did he not? Both fights were close and good fights ya? If Canelo had lost either of them by the same margin he won, I think he would still be given credit for those fights.
I try not to look at a record. I try to focus my attention on the quality of the fight and what the quality of the journey was.
What looks better, 62-7 or 59-10?
Comment
Comment