Who do you think would win and why.
Keith Thurman vs Prime Miguel Cotto
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Thurman. Bigger, stronger. Prime Cotto was 140 guy. If you mean Cotto from first years at 147, I believe Thurman still beats him. -
I think Thurman wins. When history books are written these 2 will be considered 2 very good serious operators at WW.
PAC the flyweight has wins over both.
What does that say about PAC? People say srr was so great as he has legitimate claim for being best ever ww and middleweight! Well PAC the flyweight has a better ww resume than ww campaignersComment
-
Nice way to turn this thread into a pac thread.I think Thurman wins. When history books are written these 2 will be considered 2 very good serious operators at WW.
PAC the flyweight has wins over both.
What does that say about PAC? People say srr was so great as he has legitimate claim for being best ever ww and middleweight! Well PAC the flyweight has a better ww resume than ww campaignersComment
-
Thurman has a shaky chin this would be a hell of a fight but I gotta go with the pre plaster beaten Cotto by decision.Comment
-
-
Thurman takes this. Stylistically, Cotto seems to have the biggest issues against explosive fighters but does far better against more technical fightersComment
-
Lol, people forget how great Cotto was in his prime. In 2007 until that first round vs Marg 1. He was absolutely brilliant. Thurman is losing to a 40 year Pacquaio ffs. Do you think a prime Cotto would lose to a 40 year old Pac?Comment
-
Prime Cotto lost to Pacquiao by stoppage at 144. Pac was not 40, but still. Pac by 40 is not much worse than 30 old pac.Comment
-
Comment