Fury is unbeaten so most likely is best. Not saying fury resume is as good as wlads but you don't judge it like that really
Comments Thread For: Joshua: Fury, Wilder Would Not Be Biggest Names I've Fought or Best I've Challenged
Collapse
-
-
Wilder is quite a static fighter, Joshua has faster punch combinations and better movement.I think the 41 years old Klitschko was in the same shape against Joshua than the 41 years old Povektin against Whyte...
Much slower, much weaker, much stiffer...
Wilder in his prime could beat Joshua, because he is faster, more athletic and hit harder.
But Wilder is 35 years old now.. Maybe he is done.Comment
-
The Superior One only fights a superior opposition.
Wild Boar's only chance against him is that "herky-jerky" shit, same as he did to Klit.Comment
-
Comment
-
If we're talking about names, then no. Klitschko is by far the biggest name on AJ's record. If we're talking about skill, Fury would be the best while Wilder wouldn't even rank in the top 10
Comment
-
He actually got the belts off Parker, Martin and beat Klitscho for the vacant WBA. He reclaimed them back off snickers if that helps you sleep at nightComment
-
The current prime Fury is better than past his prime Klitschko, but in terms of a caliber and legacy - Klitschko is at the top of the list and I'm not sure AJ will fight anyone of that statue, unless Fury reaches an ATG status.Comment
-
Questionably , possibly but not unquestionably. He may be arguably the best all round boxer but there is an argument for Klitschko being the most decorated or Joshua beating Klitschko catapulted him to stardom. Fury is without doubt the most awkward but let’s not forget Fury fought Klitschko at 38/39 years old. Klitschko reigned for 10 yearsComment
Comment