Spence praised for fighting Brook, Crawford trashed for considering it. Makes sense.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • champion4ever
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 23918
    • 4,090
    • 7,167
    • 202,915,785

    #21
    Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
    Porter is a two time welterweight champion who is also the mandatory for the Spence-Garcia winner, an in-house promotion fight in which he’ll get a split larger than 25%.

    Spence took his mandatory position and won the title, which every up and coming fighter does.

    Garcia and Porter were Thurman’s leftovers. They had no business being considered welterweight champions, it was all made up by the promoter and the abc titles.
    Well let me ask you this question then; Can he do both? Can he exercise his mandatory challenge for one title while temporary postponing the other for a later date?

    I am pretty sure, that there is nothing more that Al Haymon would want than to collect all of the major title belts at welterweight.

    Comment

    • Cobra Curry
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2017
      • 1344
      • 111
      • 350
      • 34,979

      #22
      Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
      Porter is a two time welterweight champion who is also the mandatory for the Spence-Garcia winner, an in-house promotion fight in which he’ll get a split larger than 25%.

      Spence took his mandatory position and won the title, which every up and coming fighter does.

      Garcia and Porter were Thurman’s leftovers. They had no business being considered welterweight champions, it was all made up by the promoter and the abc titles.
      A lot of truth here.

      Comment

      • ShaneMosleySr
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2019
        • 10325
        • 1,049
        • 903
        • 276,311

        #23
        It is my understanding that fighters are removed from the ABC rankings when they challenge for a different title.

        It’s why Danny Garcia lost that WBO spot, he’s fighting Spence.

        Originally posted by champion4ever
        Well let me ask you this question then; Can he do both? Can he exercise his mandatory challenge for one title while temporary postponing the other for a later date?

        I am pretty sure, that there is nothing more that Al Haymon would want than to collect all of the major title belts at welterweight.

        Comment

        • champion4ever
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2007
          • 23918
          • 4,090
          • 7,167
          • 202,915,785

          #24
          Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
          It is my understanding that fighters are removed from the ABC rankings when they challenge for a different title.

          It’s why Danny Garcia lost that WBO spot, he’s fighting Spence.
          Well if that's the case, and I was Shawn Porter; I would gamble on myself by fighting Crawford while taking shorts instead. He will always be able to get the winner of Spence or Danny Garcia because they all work for the same promotional company. Besides, he has already fought the other two fighters anyhow.

          Comment

          • MulaKO
            Zero F@cks Given
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 26896
            • 6,762
            • 6,070
            • 221,421

            #25
            Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
            I guess this is because Kell Brook has won every fight in dominating fashion since he lost to Spence.

            That must be why Crawford is getting criticized.

            I’m also guessing that Spence is getting credit for beating a smaller fighter in Brook, while everyone recognizes that Crawford has an advantage in the fight because he’s way smaller than Brook.

            Oh wait, being bigger is an advantage, isn’t it?

            Hmmm... I don’t know..

            Maybe it’s because Kell Brook has been knocking out middleweights in his last few fights.

            No, wait, that’s a good thing...

            Brook outperformed middleweights and undefeated prospects when he destroyed Rabchanka. That must be it.

            Oh wait, that’s a good thing.

            Maybe it’s because of that shutout win over Zerafa that looks so much worse now... oh no wait, Zerafa knocked out a former welterweight champion who has a win over Pacquiao since Brook fought him.

            So that’s a good thing.

            It must be the fact that he kicked Shawn Porter’s ass when Spence went life and death with Porter...

            No that can’t be it.

            OH I REMEMBER WHAT IT IS...

            Crawford fights on ESPN, so the PBC fans think he’s a traitor for some reason. Because they feel like they own him and he belongs to them. And if he doesn’t sign with who they want him too, he’s evil.

            That’s right, it’s a ****** fight over who has the cooler promoter.

            F**k this message board in the face. Everyone here is an idiot.


            My only concern is Brook’s is damaged goods
            And honestly speaking doesn’t bring anything to Bud’s career in all reality


            Originally posted by revelated
            You guys are letting the facts of the matter get in the way of a Crawford fan trying to defend his guy.


            It's just a good narrative to try and equate Spence and Crawford fighting Brook.

            But we dare not do the same thing with Danny Swift sparking prime Khan's chin inside 4 and Crawford low-blowing a damn-near-killed version of Khan after 9 rounds, now do we?


            Same way you let your hate get in the way of your judgement
            Bud did not hit AmirKhon in the nuts
            He hit his leg and amazingly could not continue
            The knockout was coming but Amir knew damn well that he would get sparked
            Maybe start listening to your own preachings
            Nahhh , better to hate

            Comment

            • ShaneMosleySr
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2019
              • 10325
              • 1,049
              • 903
              • 276,311

              #26
              We’ll see what he does I guess.

              I would just bet on him taking the bigger pot.

              Originally posted by champion4ever
              Well if that's the case, and I was Shawn Porter; I would gamble on myself by fighting Crawford while taking shorts instead. He will always be able to get the winner of Spence or Danny Garcia because they all work for the same promotional company. Besides, he has already fought the other two fighters anyhow.

              Comment

              • Pigeons
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2013
                • 14750
                • 1,211
                • 714
                • 37,430

                #27
                I'm a Terence Crawford guy since I saw him fight in Omaha.

                Comment

                • MUNG
                  Death Dealer
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 4183
                  • 438
                  • 79
                  • 31,567

                  #28
                  brook is a waste of talent it looks to me, I mean the guy loves bars i think, he's got a machete in the leg after his big win doing who know's what to who know's who, he's always better than ever after every incident or problem or loss and is a total spoofer + weight drained and damaged and delusional but other than than he's good to go

                  Comment

                  • sicko
                    The Truth Hurts
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 34211
                    • 2,594
                    • 839
                    • 151,307

                    #29
                    You reaching with this Sh^t!

                    Spence Jr vs Kell was 3 years ago. Kell is not anything close to WTF he was 3 Years ago and that has nothing to do with trying to discredit Crawford it is FACTS! No he won't get much credit for beating Kell Brook especially if Kell Drains to 147...a weight he haven't fought at IN 3 YEARS since that Spence Jr fight and some people still say he was "Drained" for the Spence Jr fight

                    Comment

                    • baroidi
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2017
                      • 2190
                      • 787
                      • 638
                      • 23,547

                      #30
                      I wasn't too hyped about the Spence-Brook fight, but at least you could say that Brook losing to GGG was because of the size advantage of GGG. So there was some intrigue in seeing how Brook fairs against a similar sized Spence, but Spence broke Brook's other orbital. After back to back damaging losses to top competition, a fighter loses a lot of luster and should not be considered a top opponent, especially for someone like "P4P" Crawford whose resume is already weak.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP