If Canelo is so good, why are there 8 undefeated champs from 160-175?

[ShaneMosleySr]

Szeremeta would beat Kovalev.

LMAO


wait, so..... Sacramento is a good opponent for Hypekin... but Canelo is a bum for not beating champions from TWO divisions higher

oh lordie

[aboutfkntime]

How is Canelo’s resume at 160 better than Golovkin’s?

I said above 160


Jacobs/Golovkin/Kovalev > Jacobs/Lemieux/Derevy


it is hilarious that Canelo forged a better resume in the last two years... than Golovkin forged his entire career

[aboutfkntime]

You said he couldn’t unify.

He unified three titles.

name the champions he beat to unify ?

stop your bullshlt, he beat Lemieux

[aboutfkntime]

Szeremeta would beat Kovalev.

looooooooooooooooool

I'm out... my job is done LMAO

[techliam]

he fought the only C-level fighter in the list below

Saunders
Andrade
Charlo
Lemieux

not sure if that was worth you mentioning

put it this way...

* Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
* Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
* Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this thread

not sure you did Golovkin any favors at all there

I don’t disagree with the rest of your post, just that you said Golovkin didn’t unify... he did. Correcting an error and doing Golovkin a favour are two totally different things

[aboutfkntime]

I don’t disagree with the rest of your post, just that you said Golovkin didn’t unify... he did. Correcting an error and doing Golovkin a favour are two totally different things

fair call ^^

Golovkin fought the only guy he knew he could beat

everyone else got a pass

[Mammoth]

arguably lost to Derevyanchenko.

What ****** argue that faggot shit?

[Roadblock]

Thread title begins with " If Canelo is so good " can you define the SO for me as it will vary for everyone, youre talking to a group with something you would ask one on one.