If Canelo is so good, why are there 8 undefeated champs from 160-175?
Collapse
-
he fought the only C-level fighter in the list below
Saunders
Andrade
Charlo
Lemieux
not sure if that was worth you mentioning
put it this way...
* Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
* Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
* Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this thread
not sure you did Golovkin any favors at all thereComment
-
bullshlt, he fought that scrub Lemieux
* Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
* Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
* Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this threadComment
-
Comment
-
Originally Posted by ShaneMosleySr
Szeremeta is a good opponent. He’s undefeated and ranked in the top 10 by everyone.
LMAO
wait, so..... Sacramento is a good opponent for Hypekin... but Canelo is a bum for not beating champions from TWO divisions higher
oh lordieComment
-
Comment
-
How is Canelo’s resume at 160 better than Golovkin’s?
he fought the only C-level fighter in the list below
Saunders
Andrade
Charlo
Lemieux
not sure if that was worth you mentioning
put it this way...
* Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
* Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
* Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this thread
not sure you did Golovkin any favors at all thereComment
-
You said he couldn’t unify.
He unified three titles.
Comment
-
Comment