Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Canelo is so good, why are there 8 undefeated champs from 160-175?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
    How do you know Daniel Jacobs, who has lost to every elite fighter he’s faced, is a better fighter than Callum Smith and Billie Joe Saunders?
    Smith LOST to Ryder. Flat out.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
      Szeremeta is a good opponent. He’s undefeated and ranked in the top 10 by everyone.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by techliam View Post
        Golovkin did unify at middleweight though, in the ring


        he fought the only C-level fighter in the list below

        Saunders
        Andrade
        Charlo
        Lemieux

        not sure if that was worth you mentioning

        put it this way...

        * Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
        * Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
        * Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this thread

        not sure you did Golovkin any favors at all there

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
          “When hypekin could not even unify at middleweight”

          Golovkin unified three titles at middleweight.




          bullshlt, he fought that scrub Lemieux


          * Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
          * Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
          * Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this thread

          Comment


          • #35
            Andrade is in his absolute prime and is one of the most talented boxers out there.

            Kovalev is shot. He almost lost to a guy with 18 pro fights and no amateur background.

            Andrade-Kovalev is a ****ing murder dude.

            Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
            Based on what?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally Posted by ShaneMosleySr
              Szeremeta is a good opponent. He’s undefeated and ranked in the top 10 by everyone.

              LMAO


              wait, so..... Sacramento is a good opponent for Hypekin... but Canelo is a bum for not beating champions from TWO divisions higher

              oh lordie

              Comment


              • #37
                Jacobs was knocked unconscious but Pirog, lost his other two big shots and arguably lost to Derevyanchenko.

                So one performance by Smith doesn’t confirm that Jacobs is better to me.

                Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                Smith LOST to Ryder. Flat out.

                Comment


                • #38
                  How is Canelo’s resume at 160 better than Golovkin’s?

                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  he fought the only C-level fighter in the list below

                  Saunders
                  Andrade
                  Charlo
                  Lemieux

                  not sure if that was worth you mentioning

                  put it this way...

                  * Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
                  * Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
                  * Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this thread

                  not sure you did Golovkin any favors at all there

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    You said he couldn’t unify.

                    He unified three titles.

                    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                    bullshlt, he fought that scrub Lemieux


                    * Canelo has been fighting above 160 for 2 years
                    * Golovkin fought at 160 his entire career
                    * Canelo already has a better resume above 160 than Golovkin LMAO... which is fkn hilarious in context of this thread

                    Comment


                    • #40

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP