Remember how easily Crawford beat Postol?
Collapse
-
-
That is because Crawford is a much better fighter than either of them an he will beat them if he ever fights them. Crawford fought a prime Postol while they fought a well past prime Postol.Comment
-
Comment
-
Postol’s style is to step back, step back, always step back. It’s one of the biggest headaches you can give anyone. Same reason counter-punchers are such an issue, they don’t like to lead, and will sit and wait to step back and counter you.
Anyway, my point is Crawford took that away by being the one to move. And Postol’s not so good at leading. People love their intelligent, fighters who never take chances, but they should really respect the attacker’s more, because it’s about twice as difficult to lead.Comment
-
Bud dropped prime Postol 3x and even gave Postol a chance to win in the last round by standing right in Postol’s range!
Both Ramirez and Taylor struggled a lot an arguably lost against a past prime Postol!
It shows you the level of Crawford clearly!
I think Taylor handles Ramirez but I also wouldn’t be shocked if Ramirez wins it either cuz Josh isn’t no Postol, he’s more willing to stand an trade!Comment
-
Why do you keep perpetuating this triangulation nonsense?
If fighter A beats fighter B, who beat fighter C, does that mean
fighter A automatically beats fighter C?
Porter beat Garcia, Spence beat Porter, are you saying
Spence beats Garcia too?
This is boxing not weight lifting competition.Comment
-
I believe that both Taylor and Prograis would defeat Ramirez to be honest. I thought that Ramirez should have stopped this version of Postol last night but one can make a convincing argument that Ramirez lost.Comment
Comment