Terence Crawford Dilemma

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fists_of_Fury
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 7366
    • 2,351
    • 12,608
    • 58,085

    #41
    Beggers can't be choosers. Crawford is no star. He brings the weakest belt to the table also. He doesn't get to choose who he fights like a Mayweather or Pacquiao. Thurman may have lost to Pacquiao but was competitive. Crawford fought inactive peg legged Jose Bumavidez, washed up glass jaw Amir Khan, and Eurobum Mean Machine ffs. They didn't have belts and beat nobody worth a damn at welterweight unlike Thurman. Thurman is a legit top welterweight. Crawford fanboys are dumb as sheeit and continue to come up with dumbass excuses for their cherrypicking hype job ducking top welterweights. Crawford was supposedly ducked but re-signed with Top Rank and ESPN exclusivity to duck the top guys. He's being called out by a guy that would be the best name on his resume and clowns want him to continue ducking top competition lol. The glass jaw cherrypicking hype job will get exposed and stopped by Thurman and deep down Fraudford's bunboys know this. He was put on ***** street by inactive and blown up Gamboa and dropped last fight by Eurobum Mean Machine. Stop ducking Thurman thun!

    Comment

    • JakeTheBoxer
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2014
      • 20987
      • 4,583
      • 2,782
      • 123,960

      #42
      Originally posted by Ray*
      Exactly... so no one should be expecting Arum to put money in him to fight another boxer who is just there for a big payday to then disappear again. Boxing need to stand up to these frauds. Take fights WHEN it meant something, WHEN the fans want it. NOT after losing your belts, NOT after having done *hit for years. Crawford/Thurman is a waste of money and time.
      If Crawford doesn`t take Thurman or Brook, he will fight Collazo or Bes*****. Wait and see.

      Crawford fought welterweights that were never world champs, so the fact Thurman doesn`t have a belt shouldn`t be a problem.

      Comment

      • Ray*
        Be safe!!!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 44867
        • 1,654
        • 1,608
        • 558,890

        #43
        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer
        If Crawford doesn`t take Thurman or Brook, he will fight Collazo or Bes*****. Wait and see.

        Crawford fought welterweights that were never world champs, so the fact Thurman doesn`t have a belt shouldn`t be a problem.
        Thurman is garbage truck juice. Fans need to stop hyping dead fights based on names. He hasn’t done nothing and brings nothing. He should have taken the fight when it meant something. He should not be rewarded now for his previous ducking.

        Comment

        • pacmanis1
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 2218
          • 137
          • 108
          • 16,982

          #44
          Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer
          As someone suggested, Crawford is black GGG. he will beat all the bums he can get under Top rank, when he gets old, like 35 -36, he will get a payday fighting one of PBC boys and lose on cards.

          Bob still has old Collazo, Bes***** and others.
          Bingo!!! Crawford and GGG have had identical careers in many ways. If you cant see that and defend one and hate the other than your not a fan of the sport, just a nut hugger.

          The sad part is I, and I’m sure many other fans, have just tuned out on Crawford. He’s getting up there in age and once he finally gets a meaningful fight he’ll probably be on the down swing. No ones going to be reference him as a great in 10-20 years, people will just wonder what could have been.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP