Comments Thread For: Bob Arum: ESPN Stepped Up To Keep Lomachenko-Lopez Off Pay-Per-View

[Goldie]

Never said his guarentee was more.

But liars need to lie to pretned theyre right.

BTW

Helped you learn a math term today. You're welcome

You're a real piece of sht and if this was an offline exchange I’d beat the sht out you just off gp.

Lomachenko took a reduced purse to relieved the company and make this fight. His contractual guarantee is more than 3.5 million.

[R-Hand Southpaw]

You're a real piece of sht and if this was an offline exchange I’d beat the sht out you just off gp.

But ya can't can you?

Lolololo. You just clowning but you mad bruh.

Too fun. Lolololo

[Goldie]

But ya can't can you?

Lolololo. You just clowning but you mad bruh.

Too fun. Lolololo

Yea we’re both clowning because this is just the internet. You and I both know you wouldn’t pull this offline though.

[DaBeastO]

This fight would not be happening unless Lopez got a bit more than $1.5MM, so that part of the article is not accurate. I believe he's getting closer to $2.5MM. All in all, Bob is still lying and talking out of his a** as usual.

unless you have seen personally lopez's contract you are the one talking out your ass. LOL at lopez getting anywhere near 2.5

[DaBeastO]

Top Rank and espn showing pbc and fox/showtime how its done! al gaymon needs to do better!

[Ake-Dawg]

Equal or less than 3.5 million

That means

1 to 3.5 million

So 2 dollars is correct and so is 3.49 million dollars

Any number in between means I'm right.

Ah. Excuse me for being the fool for not understanding how LOW IQ you are.

You called me a liar for suggesting that. So who's right?

The bottom line is, the first statement Arum made, which you hung your hat on conflicts with the statement Arum made in a subsequent interview. First statement he indicates that Loma took less than his minimum to make the fight "because he gets it". The second statement was that Loma is still getting more than his minimum.

Lastly...in no case can "equal" mean "more" or "less". The secind you used equal your statement was dead in the water. Probably a slip, but no need defending it.