The most legitimate sanctioning body: IBF, WBC, WBO, or WBA?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pigeons
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2013
    • 14753
    • 1,211
    • 714
    • 37,430

    #11
    The WBA, obviously.

    Comment

    • Rockin'
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 23915
      • 4,461
      • 12,395
      • 1,239,562

      #12
      I believe that your question is an oxymoron. ……..Rockin'

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47365
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #13
        The most legitimate sanctioning body:

        omg... this ret4rded casual-fan question again

        and the IBF, wtf... ???

        the IBF rankings are fkn ret4rded

        none of those asshats are definitive, most are usually 50% correct or less... but the IBF are lucky to run at 20%, truly awful

        on what planet do you not judge the word " legitimate " by results?

        their results are shlt

        I vote... no confidence

        I get my news elsewhere

        #fakenewsWBCWBAWBOIBF
        Last edited by aboutfkntime; 08-13-2020, 11:30 PM.

        Comment

        • aboutfkntime
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 47365
          • 1,631
          • 3,563
          • 391,308

          #14
          Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat
          Add the choice: None. Then I'll vote.




          quoted for truth

          Comment

          • aboutfkntime
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2015
            • 47365
            • 1,631
            • 3,563
            • 391,308

            #15
            Originally posted by Rockin'
            I believe that your question is an oxymoron. ……..Rockin'



            " legitimate " .....

            nothing to see here

            Comment

            • LoadedWraps
              Official NSB POTY 2016
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2010
              • 24197
              • 1,009
              • 1,464
              • 190,165

              #16
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime
              omg... this ret4rded casual-fan question again

              and the IBF, wtf... ???

              the IBF rankings are fkn ret4rded

              none of those asshats are definitive, most are usually 50% correct or less... but the IBF are lucky to run at 20%, truly awful

              on what planet do you not judge the word " legitimate " by results?

              their results are shlt

              I vote... no confidence

              I get my news elsewhere

              #fakenewsWBCWBAWBOIBF
              Crazy people are voting IBF over WBC lol.

              Comment

              • Rockin'
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2004
                • 23915
                • 4,461
                • 12,395
                • 1,239,562

                #17
                Originally posted by LoadedWraps
                Crazy people are voting IBF over WBC lol.
                The WBC is just about the most illegitimate organization out there. My passbook was with the IBF...…….Rockin'

                Comment

                • BoxOfficer
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jul 2018
                  • 407
                  • 142
                  • 1,230
                  • 18,362

                  #18
                  Originally posted by mxtali
                  The reason the IBF rankings are so bad is because established guys don’t want to fight for the belt because they know they’ll have mandatories imposes on them that cannot be avoided.
                  That, and also the so-called established fighters back out of tough eliminators and final eliminators, which simply allow lower ranked fighters to step up and overtake them.

                  Comment

                  • Squ□redCircle34
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2015
                    • 9091
                    • 286
                    • 445
                    • 100,197

                    #19
                    Easily the IBF, like someone else mentioned on here!

                    Get rid of the rest and let’s combine the colors of the WBC/WBA with the IBF and call it the GBF (Global Boxing Federation), an take all the good the WBC does for past fighters and add on to there while keeping the IBF’s integrity!

                    Boxing would be back to the number 1 sport if that happened!

                    Comment

                    • Ca$ual Fan
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2019
                      • 2063
                      • 51
                      • 10
                      • 41,406

                      #20
                      Rules should always be followed not the fighter’s or promoter’s demands. That’s what IBF does. What the other orgs are doing are reasons why boxing’s prestige is quickly losing

                      Boxing is more of a politics/business now than a plain sport

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP