Tweet
I don`t even believe Crawford would fight Pacquiao and risk losing his 0.
He will rather fight guys like Collazo, lol.
He will rather fight guys like Collazo, lol.
-
-
I already see that one guy that gets a hard on in all Manny Pacquaio threads. Guy is always fighting and arguing for hours with everyone that doesn’t subscribe to his idea that PAC is finished. Guy posts at least 60 times in one thread crawling the web for anything he can find arguing (can imagine veins popping out his forehead) and repeating the same jibberish. How can a dude have this much time on hand. You can tell he’s missing a woman or a guy in his life if thats the way he swings. Get a life bro. You are so patheticComment
-
[QUOTE=Mike D;20690160]First off, even at 42 or whatever nobody is whooping Manny's ass. Haven't people learned this by now? The most one sided fight y'all have seen him in was the Mayweather fight and Floyd landed a career low and didn't hurt Manny once. The JMM KO? Manny was about two inches away from a stoppage himself before he got KO'd. Other than that, since he made his presence known to the boxing world, when has he gotten whooped? A lot of people thought Keith was gonna walk through him and beat his ass too. What happened? After predictably people who thought that immediately started damage control by discrediting the win by saying Keith was past it. It's amazing the lengths people go to attack Manny's name.
Could Crawford beat him? Sure he could. He's obviously an elite killer and at the peak of his powers. Manny is FORTY-TWO years old
But he's not walking through Manny. That's laughable. The guy (Crawford) looked shaky as f***k against Kavaliauskas for f***k's sake. He got freaking dropped by the guy. You don't think Pacquiao can't catch Crawford? Come on now, I know some of y'all hate Manny and his fans with all your heart, but you gotta use some objectivity.
And let's be real Terrence's resume is still pretty weak for a guy with his stature. Her still doesn't have an A level scalp on his 36 fight resume. Hell Thurman has a TWO superior scalps on his resume that are easily better than any single win that Crawford has.[/QUOTE
Great objective points. I argued these same exact points last time this topic came up here but the hate for Manny won’t allow some of these clowns to see how the fight could play out on either side. It’s always Crawford is going to murder him...blah blah..u can’t tell they don’t know ish about boxing. Sure Crawford should be favored but he ll have to show true grit to beat Manny. You murder somebody that is a bum or doesn’t belong. Manny even at 42 is neither of those things.Comment
-
Pac aint beating Crawford, I highly doubt that fight will ever happen
people who think that Crawford = Thurman are tripping
Crawford is a MUCH better fighter than ThurmanComment
-
Crawford would be fool to fight the pacman, he need to stay undefeated to be relevant in the ww divisionComment
-
Arum should let crawford fight pacman to make him the real ppv star, he should take that risk or else crawford will just be forever called as the imaginary top fighter because he didn't beat any worthy opponent.Comment
-
While I agree that I too doubt it happens, and also agree that from the eye test that Crawford is superior to Keith -- their resumes still say otherwise. Keith has two victims on his ledger that are superior to any name Crawford has. Crawford's resume is sooooooo weak for a guy who is considered to be the best in the world. And Crawford is NOT invincible. By any stretch.
He had his hands full with Kavaliauskas. You know what the final punch stats (I know, everyone hates punch stats) were? Crawford landed 128 to Kavaliauskas' 118. And Kavaliauskas dropped Crawford (we all know that was a legitimate KD). And Pacquiao, even at 42, ain't no Kavaliauskas.
Crawford is undoubtedly a fabulous boxer, and he's a killer no doubt so don't get me wrong, but there remain very valid question marks.Comment
Comment