Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hopkins Backs Joshua To Knock Fury Out in Late Rounds

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    I think the magic number is 7 rounds.....Fury stands on his own two legs for about 7 rounds against Joshua....could be sooner...if a hook from either side lands on fury squarely the fight will be over shortly thereafter....I think everyone got a bit excited when Tyson ko'd wilder but if you search wilders resume good anyone with eyes would see that wilder was nothing more than a bum.....I truly believe that Tyson fury is a bum as well....he fought a terrific fight against tom Schwarz but looked like a complete turd against Otto wallin....so I don't wanna hear that "he fights down to his competition" crap.....he captured the world title in what could only be called the most boring boxing match of all time...literally the cure for insomnia......Tyson fury is a BUM....bottom line....I truly believe that and time is gonna tell it all....we just have to wait until he has the courage to face real competition....but unless he retires soon its gonna happen....you can set your watch by it.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
      So what is my race? Fuck it! Never mind! Now back to the matter at hand;

      If everything that you are saying is true then why don't the Nevada State Athletic Commission began a hearing and inquiry in light of the new evidence that has now surfaced? They won't because they fear that the truth will come out because they are probably complicit in some kind of cover up.

      Have you heard of Luis Resto and Billy Collins, Jr? Luis Resto's gloves were examined and inspected by the New York Athletic Commission too before their fight and yet Resto was able to slip through the cracks also.

      So don't act like this is some isolated case and isn't possible. Sometimes officials can be negligent and make mistakes as well. As was the case with Resto and Collins back in 1983.

      The New York State Athletic Commission did not investigate the matter until after the fight. So chances are they didn't even bother to inspect or examine the gloves before the fight and the Nevada State Athletic Commission probably didn't either.

      Also, what about how Team Fury covered the lens over the camera in their dressing room just prior to him retrieving his gloves and getting his hands wrapped? That seemed very fishy, sketchy and shady to me. What was he hiding?

      I noticed that Deontay Wilder didn't bother to cover the lens over the camera in his dressing room and you know why? It's because he had nothing to hide.

      Also, there was a full gallery of photos by that Las Vegas photographer John Gurzinski of Tyson Fury's right glove but they have all been mysteriously removed or taken down now and I ask myself why?

      Had he been approached by someone from Team Fury to take them down? I don't know but what I do know is that the timing of it is seems very suspect to me. Just like when that farmer retracted his previous statements about bribery.
      Why would there need to be an investigation? What evidence has come to light? one single still image with no video footage? Sit down ya ninny Tell me this, if Fury removed the padding, when was it done? Sneakily sometime after the officials inspected them after being fitted? If so, why didn't the referee notice? Or was it somehow done in the ring after the referee checked them? If so, why didn't the commission notice when they took possession of the gloves post fight (indisputable fact)?

      You're using an example from the 80s which, incidentally, changed the rules surrounding the inspection of gloves? Lol poor call. That exact case is why there are multiple people that carry out multiple checks. So that point is dead. You say the athletic commission probably didn't check the gloves...JAY DEAS WITNESSED THE CHECKS however incompetent you think he may be, he is more team Wilder than you will ever be. Sulaiman confirmed there were three officials present for the multiple inspections in the dressing room. You know, Sulaiman, that guy that has done his best to protect Wilder throughout his entire championship reign. So that point is dead.

      So you're saying that Fury, did what exactly? Cover a fúcking camera so he could remove the padding from the gloves? Do you realise how rétarded you sound with that tin foil hat you're wearing? So did covering the camera also blind the officials in the room? Sulaiman? JAY DEAS? That point is dead.

      So you're telling me that guy had an entire gallery of photos that "proved" Tyson Fury has no padding in his gloves, but somebody, somewhere, has removed them from his website...but left the one picture that gives the illusion and feeds the delusions that there was no padding? Do you ever think before you lie? Why would they leave what I imagine would be the worst looking picture, but remove the others? L. FÚCKING. O. FÚCKING. L!!!!!!!! That point is embarrassingly dead.

      I wasn't going to address your final feeble point, but I know for a fact you'd say "YEA SEE YOU DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUERY ABOUT THE FARMER, DID YA? EY? EY? EY?"....your final point is, that a man, who has claimed he lied, is now trustworthy? LOL You're saying that after making such a libellous statement of which he would have had to have backed up with cold, hard facts, – not only to the BBBofC but also in a civil court – that it's su****ious that he's withdrawn his statement in the face of a fact finding, official enquiry? Any reasonable individual would come to the conclusion that he could not provide cold, hard facts, which would mean he would probably lose his farm in the impending civil court case. Why couldn't he provide cold, hard facts? Because he was lying.

      Just stop it. Stop embarrassing yourself. I'm starting to feel somewhat embarrassed for you

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
        His tampered right glove which looked like there was some padding removed from them. Chances are that the Nevada State Athletic Commission and Team Wilder was negligent in examining and inspecting his gloves pre-fight and in his dressing room.

        The evidence is right there in the photos. No boxer's glove are supposed to look like that.

        Like I said earlier, had Deontay Wilder would have done something similar to Tyson Fury en route to a KO victory over him and there was sufficient enough evidence that could be proven that he had indeed cheated and to have at least warranted an inquiry or a hearing, then we wouldn't have heard the last of it by boxing fans like yourself.

        Had Deontay Wilder done this shit you fake ass boxing fans would have all lost your fucking minds. The backlash would have been both extreme and severe. There would have been calls by you guys to put him in jail and you know I am telling the truth.

        It's all hypocrisy!
        You're saying they somehow missed his glove having no padding? How? They examine the gloves after they themselves unseal them, then hand them to Fury, he puts them on, they then examine them again. How do you think they examine them? By sight and smell? No, them squeeze the fúcking glove to see if there's padding you say it was due to negligence during the dressing room inspection...so was the referee negligent as well? I guarantee there is footage of the referee squeeze Fury's gloves. Were the post-fight checks negligent as well?

        You keep going on about official investigations, enquiries and hearings; they only happen when the checks show that there has been tampering. No evidence of tampering. Checks done. Investigation complete.

        The only thing you're right about is if Wilder was proven to have cheated after knocking Fury out, there would be uproar and calls for a lifetime ban. The same goes for Fury; if he was proven to have cheated by the multiple checks and safeguards...it would be exactly the same. There would be uproar and people would call for a lifetime ban. But the fact is, there is not a shred of actual evidence to say either of them cheated.

        The only dodgy thing about the Fury v Wilder fights is the scoring from the first fight. Fury is 2–0. He embarrassed your worshipped idol twice. Build a bridge, get over it.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by InnerCityRats View Post
          Exactly! Hopkins needs to just shut his mouth and be glad Oscar gave an ex felon a job.
          U think Hopkins is racist for saying he would never lose to a white boy..... and you're not
          When I was in school, I said no girl would surpass me, what does that make me.....a **********?
          Guess what a lot of girls surpassed me, it was just a way to motivate myself

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
            His tampered right glove which looked like there was some padding removed from them. Chances are that the Nevada State Athletic Commission and Team Wilder was negligent in examining and inspecting his gloves pre-fight and in his dressing room.

            The evidence is right there in the photos. No boxer's glove are supposed to look like that.

            Like I said earlier, had Deontay Wilder would have done something similar to Tyson Fury en route to a KO victory over him and there was sufficient enough evidence that could be proven that he had indeed cheated and to have at least warranted an inquiry or a hearing, then we wouldn't have heard the last of it by boxing fans like yourself.

            Had Deontay Wilder done this shit you fake ass boxing fans would have all lost your fucking minds. The backlash would have been both extreme and severe. There would have been calls by you guys to put him in jail and you know I am telling the truth.

            It's all hypocrisy!
            Since when have photos been used as credible evidence in anything? The way two people interpret a photo will always be different - depending on what state your vision is two people will always see slight variations of the same image.

            This whole thing is a pigment of your imagination because you and the other Wilder fan girls have your tongues lodged so far up his rectum you can see his last meal... Look at the vocabulary you're using; looked like , chances are! Its utterly pathetic at this point. This is boxing. You either win, lose or draw but all of you weird Wilderettes seem to have developed this complex where you appear to have taken his defeat to Fury personal and find that pushing this BS argument justifies the loss. It says more about the type of individual you are to be honest. I hope you realize that pretty much all of us are laughing at you LOL.

            I can almost certainly guarantee that all inspections were carried out as normal. Why wouldn't they have been? There has not been anything fraudulent done with gloves since Cotto fought Margarito, why would they suddenly allow it (or through negligence as you put it) now. Whats so special about Wilder. Why would they want to conspire against him so badly. He's just another boxer that pays his sanctioning fees. Titles change hands every week ffs.

            Stop being bitter because of what you see in a photograph?! All this saga has highlighted is what a garbage boxer Deontay Wilder is and TO THIS DAY he'll have zero chance of beating Fury in the trilogy because his boxing skills are massively inferior. Just accept your favorite boxer is actually not very good and get over it!

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Elastic Recoilz View Post
              Since when have photos been used as credible evidence in anything? The way two people interpret a photo will always be different - depending on what state your vision is two people will always see slight variations of the same image.

              This whole thing is a pigment of your imagination because you and the other Wilder fan girls have your tongues lodged so far up his rectum you can see his last meal... Look at the vocabulary you're using; looked like , chances are! Its utterly pathetic at this point. This is boxing. You either win, lose or draw but all of you weird Wilderettes seem to have developed this complex where you appear to have taken his defeat to Fury personal and find that pushing this BS argument justifies the loss. It says more about the type of individual you are to be honest. I hope you realize that pretty much all of us are laughing at you LOL.

              I can almost certainly guarantee that all inspections were carried out as normal. Why wouldn't they have been? There has not been anything fraudulent done with gloves since Cotto fought Margarito, why would they suddenly allow it (or through negligence as you put it) now. Whats so special about Wilder. Why would they want to conspire against him so badly. He's just another boxer that pays his sanctioning fees. Titles change hands every week ffs.

              Stop being bitter because of what you see in a photograph?! All this saga has highlighted is what a garbage boxer Deontay Wilder is and TO THIS DAY he'll have zero chance of beating Fury in the trilogy because his boxing skills are massively inferior. Just accept your favorite boxer is actually not very good and get over it!
              Fúcking. Exactly! Not only that, pictures capture a specific moment, not an occurring event. It's like when celebrity entertainment magazines publish a picture of a celebrity that is apparently smashed out their face...yet it turns out that celebrity is just sneezing, or simply blinking at the time the picture is taken. The dimwit goes on about this one still image being irrefutable proof that Fury was blatantly cheating, yet it's literally the only still image (out of thousands) that gives the illusion/fits the narrative that the glove had no padding. If the glove had no padding then there would be hundreds, if not thousands of images to corroborate this pathetic conspiracy theory...yet there's only one

              I also find it hilarious how the narrative keeps changing every time these racist LDBC YouTubers get smashed to bits in the comment sections; first it was "Fury fought dirty, he held, grabbed Wilder in a headlock then pushed down to drain his energy"...but people stated how many times he grabbed Wilder in a headlock and pushed down. Then it went to "Fury was dislodging his hand from the glove and punching, bare knuckle, from the narrow part (wrist area) of the glove"...that got destroyed with logic and counter videos....now it's, "Yea but look at THIS ONE STILL IMAGE, it proves there was no padding in the glove, regardless of the fact the glove was inspected by multiple people multiple times before and after the fight"...L. FÚCKING. O. FÚCKING, L!!!!!!!

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Squared.Circle View Post
                Why would there need to be an investigation? What evidence has come to light? one single still image with no video footage? Sit down ya ninny Tell me this, if Fury removed the padding, when was it done? Sneakily sometime after the officials inspected them after being fitted? If so, why didn't the referee notice? Or was it somehow done in the ring after the referee checked them? If so, why didn't the commission notice when they took possession of the gloves post fight (indisputable fact)?

                You're using an example from the 80s which, incidentally, changed the rules surrounding the inspection of gloves? Lol poor call. That exact case is why there are multiple people that carry out multiple checks. So that point is dead. You say the athletic commission probably didn't check the gloves...JAY DEAS WITNESSED THE CHECKS however incompetent you think he may be, he is more team Wilder than you will ever be. Sulaiman confirmed there were three officials present for the multiple inspections in the dressing room. You know, Sulaiman, that guy that has done his best to protect Wilder throughout his entire championship reign. So that point is dead.

                So you're saying that Fury, did what exactly? Cover a fúcking camera so he could remove the padding from the gloves? Do you realise how rétarded you sound with that tin foil hat you're wearing? So did covering the camera also blind the officials in the room? Sulaiman? JAY DEAS? That point is dead.

                So you're telling me that guy had an entire gallery of photos that "proved" Tyson Fury has no padding in his gloves, but somebody, somewhere, has removed them from his website...but left the one picture that gives the illusion and feeds the delusions that there was no padding? Do you ever think before you lie? Why would they leave what I imagine would be the worst looking picture, but remove the others? L. FÚCKING. O. FÚCKING. L!!!!!!!! That point is embarrassingly dead.

                I wasn't going to address your final feeble point, but I know for a fact you'd say "YEA SEE YOU DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUERY ABOUT THE FARMER, DID YA? EY? EY? EY?"....your final point is, that a man, who has claimed he lied, is now trustworthy? LOL You're saying that after making such a libellous statement of which he would have had to have backed up with cold, hard facts, – not only to the BBBofC but also in a civil court – that it's su****ious that he's withdrawn his statement in the face of a fact finding, official enquiry? Any reasonable individual would come to the conclusion that he could not provide cold, hard facts, which would mean he would probably lose his farm in the impending civil court case. Why couldn't he provide cold, hard facts? Because he was lying.

                Just stop it. Stop embarrassing yourself. I'm starting to feel somewhat embarrassed for you
                Originally posted by Squared.Circle View Post
                You're saying they somehow missed his glove having no padding? How? They examine the gloves after they themselves unseal them, then hand them to Fury, he puts them on, they then examine them again. How do you think they examine them? By sight and smell? No, them squeeze the fúcking glove to see if there's padding you say it was due to negligence during the dressing room inspection...so was the referee negligent as well? I guarantee there is footage of the referee squeeze Fury's gloves. Were the post-fight checks negligent as well?

                You keep going on about official investigations, enquiries and hearings; they only happen when the checks show that there has been tampering. No evidence of tampering. Checks done. Investigation complete.

                The only thing you're right about is if Wilder was proven to have cheated after knocking Fury out, there would be uproar and calls for a lifetime ban. The same goes for Fury; if he was proven to have cheated by the multiple checks and safeguards...it would be exactly the same. There would be uproar and people would call for a lifetime ban. But the fact is, there is not a shred of actual evidence to say either of them cheated.

                The only dodgy thing about the Fury v Wilder fights is the scoring from the first fight. Fury is 2–0. He embarrassed your worshipped idol twice. Build a bridge, get over it.
                Let me ask you a question; Were you there when they inspected and examined the gloves? Fuck no you weren't.

                So in reality you don't have the slightest clue or idea of what the fuck you are really talking about? You are making too many damn presumptions that you cannot prove or back up.

                In addition, were you in Fury's dressing room when his gloves were retrieved and hands were being wrapped? Hell no you weren't. So then you should stick to the facts and not mere speculation and rumor.

                None of this shit you are spewing would be admissible in a court of law because you are only giving opinions and not facts. Like where were you on the evening of February 22, 2020?

                You can give these long ass ad nauseam straw man arguments all you want but where is the substance? It still doesn't change the facts or the basic premise of this debate and that is whether Tyson Fury cheated or not.

                In other words, were the gloves seen in those photos genuine or photo-shopped. So far, that's the one question you have yet to answer because you can't.

                The closest you came to answering this question is to suggest that Fury's gloves were padded with horse hair. However, once again that is also inadmissible because you can't prove it. You weren't there to either inspect or check the gloves for yourself.

                All I am trying to do is argue the facts. All you are trying to do is take a direct evidential case by turning it to a circumstantial evidential case which is not even admissible or applicable to this controversy at all.

                The bottom line is whether or not those photos of Fury's right glove were genuine or fake. It's just that plain and simple.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
                  Say listen up man! That's right. Fuck all the rules!

                  You talk about standards. However, your culture has never had any to begin with. It's always been filled with lies, hypocrisy and double standards.

                  The fact is your culture has never had to play by any rules because historically you've broken every one of them underneath the sun; From nature, man and God. So the pathetic and unredeemed one here is you not me.
                  Actually, my people like most white Americans immigrated here early in the early 1900’s and we were persecuted far worse than you can even imagine today. Your culture is given things you never worked for, we didn’t have welfare, quotas and civil rights back then, we just earned our place with hard work and dedication. That’s why we achieved. We worked for it. You never worked for anything except to be a victim.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Elastic Recoilz View Post
                    Since when have photos been used as credible evidence in anything? The way two people interpret a photo will always be different - depending on what state your vision is two people will always see slight variations of the same image.

                    This whole thing is a pigment of your imagination because you and the other Wilder fan girls have your tongues lodged so far up his rectum you can see his last meal... Look at the vocabulary you're using; looked like , chances are! Its utterly pathetic at this point. This is boxing. You either win, lose or draw but all of you weird Wilderettes seem to have developed this complex where you appear to have taken his defeat to Fury personal and find that pushing this BS argument justifies the loss. It says more about the type of individual you are to be honest. I hope you realize that pretty much all of us are laughing at you LOL.

                    I can almost certainly guarantee that all inspections were carried out as normal. Why wouldn't they have been? There has not been anything fraudulent done with gloves since Cotto fought Margarito, why would they suddenly allow it (or through negligence as you put it) now. Whats so special about Wilder. Why would they want to conspire against him so badly. He's just another boxer that pays his sanctioning fees. Titles change hands every week ffs.

                    Stop being bitter because of what you see in a photograph?! All this saga has highlighted is what a garbage boxer Deontay Wilder is and TO THIS DAY he'll have zero chance of beating Fury in the trilogy because his boxing skills are massively inferior. Just accept your favorite boxer is actually not very good and get over it!
                    Listen man, I've heard all this shit before. You are being evasive. The question is were those photos of Fury's right glove genuine or not? Just answer the damn question. Shit! If they are genuine then he cheated. However, if they are not then he is innocent and in the clear. It's just that simple.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
                      It's not photo-shopped man. That photo came right from the photographer's own web page. You see the digitized watermark on the photos.

                      If those photos are fake then he could be sued for libel. Why would he jeopardize his own livelihood like that? You are in denial sir and a damned liar and the truth is not in you.

                      The only delusional one here is you. There are several of those images of that right glove all over the internet with the same photographer's digitized watermarked signature.
                      You are the poster boy for why lack of education makes it impossible to acclimate in a civilized culture.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP