I understand Bud's stance, however sitting out waiting on fans to return to arenas is a very high-risk move, when you're turning 33 in September!
Paulie said something pretty interesting recently:
“I remember when I was waiting for my offers for certain fights,” Malignaggi said, “the main thing you were looking for, under the [Muhammad] Ali Act, was what package the TV network offered your promoter, so that you could look at what your purse could be or wind up at. I think that still comes out as the most important piece to the puzzle for fighters’ purses, the package the TV network is giving. So, as long as TV networks are paying these types of packages, I think fighters should be paid pretty much the same, if not the same. Because you say, ‘OK, you’re not gonna have a gate. But your TV ratings should be higher because nobody’s going out.’
https://www.boxingscene.com/malignag...ghters--148963
Then reality set in:
Boxing’s return to ESPN not a ratings hit
June 11, 2020
Many were hoping that with live sports still essentially on hiatus, boxing could pull some big numbers on Tuesday night when the sport returned to ESPN airwaves with the first live U.S. card since mid-March.
It did not.
The Shakur Stevenson-headlined card averaged 397,000 viewers on Tuesday night, with a peak of 609,000.
Needless to say, this is not very encouraging, and there’s really no good way you can spin it, other than the fact that relatively speaking, their male 18-49 demographic was decent, but the total viewers are so low that it’s hard to even make much of that.
The card was frankly abysmal in terms of quality matchups, and the upcoming Top Rank shows on the schedule aren’t a whole lot better. Some are a bit better, mind you, but they also have no marquee names.
https://www.badlefthook.com/2020/6/1...oxing-top-rank
In light of that, Bud you may want to reconsider?
Paulie said something pretty interesting recently:
“I remember when I was waiting for my offers for certain fights,” Malignaggi said, “the main thing you were looking for, under the [Muhammad] Ali Act, was what package the TV network offered your promoter, so that you could look at what your purse could be or wind up at. I think that still comes out as the most important piece to the puzzle for fighters’ purses, the package the TV network is giving. So, as long as TV networks are paying these types of packages, I think fighters should be paid pretty much the same, if not the same. Because you say, ‘OK, you’re not gonna have a gate. But your TV ratings should be higher because nobody’s going out.’
https://www.boxingscene.com/malignag...ghters--148963
Then reality set in:
Boxing’s return to ESPN not a ratings hit
June 11, 2020
Many were hoping that with live sports still essentially on hiatus, boxing could pull some big numbers on Tuesday night when the sport returned to ESPN airwaves with the first live U.S. card since mid-March.
It did not.
The Shakur Stevenson-headlined card averaged 397,000 viewers on Tuesday night, with a peak of 609,000.
Needless to say, this is not very encouraging, and there’s really no good way you can spin it, other than the fact that relatively speaking, their male 18-49 demographic was decent, but the total viewers are so low that it’s hard to even make much of that.
The card was frankly abysmal in terms of quality matchups, and the upcoming Top Rank shows on the schedule aren’t a whole lot better. Some are a bit better, mind you, but they also have no marquee names.
https://www.badlefthook.com/2020/6/1...oxing-top-rank
In light of that, Bud you may want to reconsider?
Comment