If Whyte didn't get popped for PEDS he would've had his shot by now, he's only got himself to blame.
Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Takes Legal Action Against The WBC
Collapse
-
Because he is the highest paid boxer of the world in 2020. He earned 57 million. Thats 10 more than wilder and Aj. Try to keep upComment
-
You should be banned from this forum for being such a bitter fággotThis euro-bum Shyte, should be banned from boxing like that other chump Tyson Fury, the BBBofC failed the sport again. These egregious scandals only happens in the failed dreadful HW division. I remember Alexander Povetkin failing doping test and getting his way in court vs. Deontay Wilder in the end.
crime pays.


Comment
-
Whyte ducked wilder numerous times. Anti wilder propaganda won’t work. Beside Fury is the champ now and he says Whyte is worthless which is trueComment
-
Finally! Bravo!
That's how you do it when your rights are being violated or denied. You don't go out on a street and start accusing people who made you a multimillionaire as racists, mixed with calls for segregation. No! You go out and file a lawsuit. Or even better, you file a lawsuit without even going out. Bravo again. Respect!
btw, hope he bankrupts that corrupt Cartel.Last edited by James Hunt; 06-15-2020, 04:46 AM.Comment
-
Whyte ducked numerous opportunities to fight wilder and did drugs. Like fury said Whyte is a nobody. Also Whyte got reinstated as mandatory in dec 2019 after his failed drug test situation. Don’t see what you UK guys get out of peddling lies and propagandaComment
-
You're absolutely right. You starve for education.This stinks of Eddie Hearn’s trickery. Force the WBC or Fury’s camp to make a decision quickly to either dump the Wilder trilogy fight or to vacate/elevate so Whyte becomes full champ so Matchroom has all the cards for undisputed.
Someone educate me here...can the WBC dump Whyte as the mandatory?
Comment
-
My idea is: make Fury the franchise champ and let him fight AJ for unification. Then make Wilder and Whyte fight for the regular title. Last, the two winners fight. All this within 2021.Comment
-
He wants that WBC belt and he was also paying sanctioning fees to WBC, so why wouldn't he deserve a shot at WBC belt.Was Hearn doing a dis-service to Whyte when Whyte refused a 4m deal to fight AJ? Should Hearn have put more pressure on him to accept or visa versa? Did he dis-service Whyte when other offers came his way in terms of title shot ladder?
He's been Mando for a while and turned down multiple chances to move forward. I could sympathise had he never got a sniff at anything but he has and turned his nose up.. Now all of a sudden when noises are getting louder regarding AJ and Fury, legal action is taken with the WBC..
Is that Whyte having enough? Whichever way Hearn would know about this legal action beforehand so either they've fell out or Hearn has given the go ahead... All while trying to convince the public Fury and AJ is at the forefront.. People are clearly asking if there's a hidden agenda somewhere..
Hearns great at his job. However, Many people on here pick up on him shifting attention/blame to his fighters but seems you like to just exonerate him from anything..
Clearly something isn't right.
The WBC should take some blame in this. It shouldn't have got this far. They should have just stripped him of his ranking when he refused his chances and had done with it...
Whyte's chances to fight for other belts have nothing to do with WBC's obligations towards Whyte. If WBC didn't say no when he was paying those fees to them, they also shouldn't say no when his mando term is due, it actually was few years back. Is it so hard to understand?Comment
-
Yes but these are voluntary acts by Whyte. He's paying sanctioning fees for the belts he has, and the mandatory position, not for the world title beltHe wants that WBC belt and he was also paying sanctioning fees to WBC, so why wouldn't he deserve a shot at WBC belt.
Whyte's chances to fight for other belts have nothing to do with WBC's obligations towards Whyte. If WBC didn't say no when he was paying those fees to them, they also shouldn't say no when his mando term is due, it actually was few years back. Is it so hard to understand?
I'm not sure what the legal justification is really. The WBC's rules are clear - the mandatory can be enforced whenever the championships committee feel like. If you want to fight for an organisation that actually follows rules, then I'm not sure why he's isolating himself to the WBC. Seems like a bad judgementComment
Comment